Literature DB >> 18568965

Subjective ratings of upper extremity exposures: inter-method agreement with direct measurement of exposures.

Bryan Buchholz1, Jung-Soon Park, Judith E Gold, Laura Punnett.   

Abstract

This study examined the agreement of subjective ratings of upper extremity exposures with corresponding direct measurements obtained simultaneously from workers. Psychophysical ratings of exposure, based on the Borg CR-10 scale, were obtained for the period of time in which direct measurements were acquired using electrogoniometers (wrist), electroinclinometers (shoulder) and electromyography (grip force). Subjects were selected from workers at two automobile manufacturing plants. Significant relationships between subjective ratings of wrist position and measured wrist posture or motion and between ratings of shoulder position and measured shoulder posture were not found. Ratings of manual effort were significantly correlated with directly measured grip force (% maximum voluntary contraction). Ratings of pace were significantly correlated with directly measured wrist motion and this relationship was strengthened with the addition of relative grip force as a covariate. Workers with hand/wrist symptoms provided ratings that were more strongly related to the directly measured exposures than those without symptoms. Self-report by workers is an alternative to more resource-intensive and invasive exposure assessment methods. However, the validity of workers' self-reported exposure assessments has been questioned. The objective of this study was to examine the agreement of selected questionnaire items with corresponding direct measurements from bioinstrumentation and to provide a better understanding of worker self-reports.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18568965      PMCID: PMC6548431          DOI: 10.1080/00140130801915220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation and comparison of three exposure assessment techniques.

Authors:  R L Neitzel; W E Daniell; L Sheppard; H W Davies; N S Seixas
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Variability and misclassification of worker estimated hand force.

Authors:  A M Dale; A E Rohn; A Patton; J Standeven; B Evanoff
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Quantification of perceived exertion during isometric force production with the Borg scale in healthy individuals and patients with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Stephen Hampton; Gina Armstrong; Monika Shah Ayyar; Sheng Li
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.119

4.  Self-reported physical work exposures and incident carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Ann Marie Dale; Bethany T Gardner; Angelique Zeringue; Jaime Strickland; Alexis Descatha; Alfred Franzblau; Bradley A Evanoff
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  The CONSTANCES job exposure matrix based on self-reported exposure to physical risk factors: development and evaluation.

Authors:  Alexis Descatha; Ann Marie Dale; Bradley A Evanoff; Marcus Yung; Skye Buckner-Petty; Johan Hviid Andersen; Yves Roquelaure
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.402

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.