Literature DB >> 18568749

Survey of chicken rearing conditions in Italy: effects of litter quality and stocking density on productivity, foot dermatitis and carcase injuries.

A Meluzzi1, C Fabbri, E Folegatti, F Sirri.   

Abstract

1. A survey was carried out to assess some welfare indicators in broilers reared by the largest poultry companies in Italy, to determine whether they accord with European proposal COM (2005) 221 final. 2. Productive traits, carcase injuries and foot dermatitis were recorded from 279,640 broiler chickens reared in winter and in summer in 5 farms representative of the Italian production system. 3. The densities currently used in Italy are in accordance with the European proposal, which recommends that broilers are kept at a density lower than 30 to 32 kg live weight/m(2) and not exceeding 38 to 40 kg live weight/m(2). 4. Season markedly influenced broiler welfare status, with the worst score collected in winter cycles, when the recommended limit of 50 points for foot pad dermatitis was exceeded. 5. Stocking density is not a straightforward indicator for bird welfare; there was no relationship between stocking density and lesion incidence or mortality rate. 6. The control of environmental conditions, particularly litter quality, appears to be a key issue for broiler welfare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18568749     DOI: 10.1080/00071660802094156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  14 in total

1.  Responses of male broiler chickens from two genetic groups to different stocking densities in a semi-arid subtropical environment.

Authors:  Kow Benyi; Owoahene Acheampong-Boateng; Kgabo T Mahlako
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 2. Productive performance and carcass characteristics.

Authors:  Alice P J T Garcês; Sónia M Santana Afonso; Abel Chilundo; Chenjerai T S Jairoce
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Different litter compositions influence broiler chicken locomotion.

Authors:  D K Barbosa; R G Garcia; M F C Burbarelli; C M Komiyama; E R S Gandra; B B Przybulinski; V A R Castilho; J P T Bueno; W Santos
Journal:  Iran J Vet Res       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 1.226

4.  Validation of a simple binary scoring system for assessment of welfare measures of 10-day-old commercial broilers and their correlation with environmental parameters.

Authors:  Priyanka Kumari; Hong-Lim Choi; Shamira Hazi Metali; Siti Anisah Hazi Yussof; Jiwoon Han
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-07

5.  Prevalence rates of health and welfare conditions in broiler chickens change with weather in a temperate climate.

Authors:  Chérie E Part; Phil Edwards; Shakoor Hajat; Lisa M Collins
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Effects of different floor materials on the welfare and behaviour of slow- and fast-growing broilers.

Authors:  Enver Çavuşoğlu; Metin Petek
Journal:  Arch Anim Breed       Date:  2019-06-14

7.  Relationship between severity of footpad dermatitis and carcass performance in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Shinichiro Hashimoto; Kenichi Yamazaki; Takeshi Obi; Kozo Takase
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 1.267

8.  Effect of Different Flooring Designs on the Performance and Foot Pad Health in Broilers and Turkeys.

Authors:  Bussarakam Chuppava; Christian Visscher; Josef Kamphues
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  The Productivity and Financial Impacts of Eight Types of Environmental Enrichment for Broiler Chickens.

Authors:  Philip J Jones; Fernanda M Tahamtani; Ida J Pedersen; Jarkko K Niemi; Anja B Riber
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 10.  Newborn calf welfare: a review focusing on mortality rates.

Authors:  Katsuji Uetake
Journal:  Anim Sci J       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 1.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.