Literature DB >> 18568406

How effective has the Clean Water Act been at reducing pollutant mass emissions to the Southern California Bight over the past 35 years?

Greg S Lyon1, Eric D Stein.   

Abstract

The Clean Water Act (CWA) has regulated discharges of contaminants since 1972. However, evaluations of the CWA's effectiveness at improving regional water quality are lacking, primarily because integration of monitoring data from multiple dischargers to assess cumulative effects is not required. A rare opportunity exists to assess CWA effectiveness by integrating mass emissions data from all major sources of contaminants to the Southern California Bight from 1971 to 2000. While the coastal population grew by 56% and total effluent volume increased 31% since 1971, mass emissions of nearly all constituents decreased since passage of the CWA, most by greater than 65%. Publicly owned treatment works were the dominant point source of many contaminants, but also accounted for the greatest reductions in pollutant discharge since 1971. As point source treatment has improved, the relative contribution of non-point sources, such as storm water runoff has increased. Despite the increased importance of storm water discharges, regional monitoring and data compilation of this source is lacking, making it difficult to accurately assess trends in non-point source discharge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18568406     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-008-0408-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of the pollutant loads in dry and wet weather runoff in a southern California urban watershed.

Authors:  T N McPherson; S J Burian; H J Turin; M K Stenstrom; I H Suffet
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.915

2.  Watershed and land use-based sources of trace metals in urban storm water.

Authors:  Liesl L Tiefenthaler; Eric D Stein; Kenneth C Schiff
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Watershed-based sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban storm water.

Authors:  Eric D Stein; Liesl L Tiefenthaler; Kenneth Schiff
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.742

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  The temporal effects of heavy metal contamination on the fish community of the West Fork White River, Delaware County, Indiana, USA.

Authors:  Drew Holloway; Jason Doll; Robert Shields
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  The potential and limitations of linking biological monitoring data and restoration needs of urbanized waterways: a case study.

Authors:  Stanley Kemp
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Regional assessment of marine and estuarine sediment toxicity in Southern California, USA.

Authors:  Darrin Greenstein; Steven Bay; Matthew Jacobe; Carlita Barton; Ken Sakamoto; Diana Young; Kerry Ritter; Ken Schiff
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Coastal pollution limits pelagic larval dispersal.

Authors:  Jonathan B Puritz; Robert J Toonen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Voluntary Restoration: Mitigation's Silent Partner in the Quest to Reverse Coastal Wetland Loss in the USA.

Authors:  Rachel K Gittman; Christopher J Baillie; Katie K Arkema; Richard O Bennett; Jeff Benoit; Seth Blitch; Julien Brun; Anthony Chatwin; Allison Colden; Alyssa Dausman; Bryan DeAngelis; Nathaniel Herold; Jessica Henkel; Rachel Houge; Ronald Howard; A Randall Hughes; Steven B Scyphers; Tisa Shostik; Ariana Sutton-Grier; Jonathan H Grabowski
Journal:  Front Mar Sci       Date:  2019-08-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.