Literature DB >> 18567906

Increasing individual responsibility in Dutch health care: is solidarity losing ground?

Ruud Ter Meulen1, Hans Maarse.   

Abstract

This article presents various developments in Dutch health care policy toward a greater role for individual financial responsibility, such as cost-control measures, priority setting, rationing, and market reform. Instead of the collective responsibility that is characteristic of previous times, one can observe in government policies an increased emphasis on the need for individuals to take care of one's own health and health care needs. Moreover, surveys point to decreasing levels of public support for "unlimited" solidarity and "irresponsible" health behavior. This article attempts to answer the question of how these policies and public attitudes are limiting the ethical principles of solidarity and equal access to care that have long guided Dutch health care policy making. The authors argue that from a moral point of view, the increased emphasis on individual responsibility is acceptable as long as it does not affect solidarity with those weak and vulnerable groups who are not able to take individual responsibility, such as the demented and mentally handicapped.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18567906     DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhn011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  5 in total

1.  Co-responsibility: a new horizon for today's health care?

Authors:  Ignaas Devisch
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2012-06

2.  Varying Opinions on Who Deserves Collectively Financed Health Care Services: A Discrete Choice Experiment on Allocation Preferences of the General Public.

Authors:  Maartje J van der Aa; Aggie T G Paulus; Mickaël J C Hiligsmann; Johannes A M Maarse; Silvia M A A Evers
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  Internists' ambivalence toward their role in health counseling and promotion: A qualitative study on the internists' beliefs and attitudes.

Authors:  Nicolien M H Kromme; Kees T B Ahaus; Reinold O B Gans; Harry B M van de Wiel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Recognizing the ethical implications of stem cell research: A call for broadening the scope.

Authors:  Lars S Assen; Karin R Jongsma; Rosario Isasi; Marianna A Tryfonidou; Annelien L Bredenoord
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 7.765

5.  A Digital Innovation for the Personalized Management of Adherence: Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats.

Authors:  Anna-Elisa Hein; Bernard Vrijens; Mickael Hiligsmann
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2020-12-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.