Literature DB >> 18567903

Bonuses as incentives and rewards for health responsibility: a good thing?

Harald Schmidt1.   

Abstract

Bonuses, as incentives or rewards for health-related behavior, feature prominently in German social health insurance. Their goal is centered around promoting personal responsibility, but reducing overall health-care expenditure and enabling competition between sickness funds also play a role. The central position of personal responsibility in German health-care policy is described, and a framework is offered for an analysis of the ethical issues raised by policies seeking to promote responsibility. The framework entails seven tests relating to: solidarity; equality and equity; intrusiveness; attributability and opportunity of choice; evidence, rationale, and feasibility; affected third parties; and coherence. It is contended that a focus on tests, in particular from within contractualism, is the most appropriate way of addressing the question of health responsibility in pluralistic societies. However, taken by themselves, the tests also allow an identification of the key ethical issues by particular policies, which are illustrated by applying the framework to particular bonus polices.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18567903     DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhn007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  9 in total

1.  Should people with unhealthy lifestyles pay higher health insurance premiums?

Authors:  David R Buchanan
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2011-02

2.  Insurance and prevention: ethical aspects.

Authors:  Mikael Dubois
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2011-02

Review 3.  Patient health incentives: ethical challenges and frameworks.

Authors:  Eran P Klein
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-12

4.  Willingness to participate in a lifestyle intervention program of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a conjoint analysis.

Authors:  Paul F van Gils; Mattijs S Lambooij; Marloes Hw Flanderijn; Matthijs van den Berg; G Ardine de Wit; Albertine J Schuit; Jeroen N Struijs; B van den Berg
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  The effect of out-of-pocket costs and financial rewards in a discrete choice experiment: an application to lifestyle programs.

Authors:  Johanna O P Wanders; Jorien Veldwijk; G Ardine de Wit; Huberta E Hart; Paul F van Gils; Mattijs S Lambooij
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Acceptability of financial incentives and penalties for encouraging uptake of healthy behaviours: focus groups.

Authors:  Emma L Giles; Falko F Sniehotta; Elaine McColl; Jean Adams
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  mHealth for Tuberculosis Treatment Adherence: A Framework to Guide Ethical Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation.

Authors:  Michael J DiStefano; Harald Schmidt
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2016-06-27

8.  Thinking ethical and regulatory frameworks in medicine from the perspective of solidarity on both sides of the Atlantic.

Authors:  Barbara Prainsack; Alena Buyx
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2016-12

9.  "It gets people through the door": a qualitative case study of the use of incentives in the care of people at risk or living with HIV in British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Marilou Gagnon; Adrian Guta; Ross Upshur; Stuart J Murray; Vicky Bungay
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.