Literature DB >> 18567266

Exemplars and prototypes in natural language concepts: a typicality-based evaluation.

Wouter Voorspoels1, Wolf Vanpaemel, Gert Storms.   

Abstract

Are natural language categories represented by instances of the category or by a summary representation? We used an exemplar model and a prototype model, both derived within the framework of the generalized context model (Nosofsky, 1984, 1986), to predict typicality ratings for 12 superordinate natural language concepts. The models were fitted to typicality ratings averaged across participants and to the typicality judgments of individual participants. Both analyses yielded results in favor of the exemplar model. These results suggest that higher-level natural language concepts are represented by their subordinate members, rather than by a summary representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18567266     DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.3.630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

1.  Determining the Dimensionality of Multidimensional Scaling Representations for Cognitive Modeling.

Authors:  Michael D. Lee
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  The instantiation principle re-evaluated.

Authors:  Els De Wilde; Veerle Vanoverberghe; Gert Storms; Paul De Boeck
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2003-11

3.  Typicality in logically defined categories: exemplar-similarity versus rule instantiation.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-03

4.  Dutch norm data for 13 semantic categories and 338 exemplars.

Authors:  Wim Ruts; Simon De Deyne; Eef Ameel; Wolf Vanpaemel; Timothy Verbeemen; Gert Storms
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

5.  Determining the dimensionality in spatial representations of semantic concepts.

Authors:  Steven Verheyen; Eef Ameel; Gert Storms
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

6.  The instantiation principle in natural categories.

Authors:  E Heit; L W Barsalou
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1996-07

7.  Selective attention and the formation of linear decision boundaries: comment on McKinley and Nosofsky (1996).

Authors:  W T Maddox; F G Ashby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-03

9.  Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  4 in total

1.  A formal ideal-based account of typicality.

Authors:  Wouter Voorspoels; Wolf Vanpaemel; Gert Storms
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

Review 2.  Model-guided search for optimal natural-science-category training exemplars: A work in progress.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Craig A Sanders; Xiaojin Zhu; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

3.  Idealness and similarity in goal-derived categories: a computational examination.

Authors:  Wouter Voorspoels; Gert Storms; Wolf Vanpaemel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-02

4.  Interpretation difficulty of normal versus abnormal radiographs using a pediatric example.

Authors:  Kathy Boutis; Stefan Cano; Martin Pecaric; T Bram Welch-Horan; Brooke Lampl; Carrie Ruzal-Shapiro; Martin Pusic
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2016-03-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.