Literature DB >> 18567257

Delayed memory for visual-haptic exploration of familiar objects.

Allison E C Pensky1, Kathryn A Johnson, Susan Haag, Donald Homa.   

Abstract

Long-term memory of haptic, visual, and cross-modality information was investigated. In Experiment 1, subjects briefly explored 40 commonplace objects visually or haptically and then received a recognition test with categorically similar foils in the same or the alternative modality both immediately and after 1 week. Recognition was best for visual input and test, with haptic memory still apparent after a week's delay. Recognition was poorest in the cross-modality conditions, with performance on the haptic-visual and visual-haptic cross-modal conditions being nearly identical. Visual and haptic information decayed at similar rates across a week delay. In Experiment 2, subjects simultaneously viewed and handled the same objects, and transfer was tested in a successive cue-modality paradigm. Performance with the visual modality again exceeded that with the haptic modality. Furthermore, initial errors on the haptic test were often corrected when followed by the visual presentation, both immediately and after 1 week. However, visual test errors were corrected by haptic cuing on the immediate test only. These results are discussed in terms of shared information between the haptic and visual modalities, and the ease of transfer between these modalities immediately and after a substantial delay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18567257     DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.3.574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

1.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures.

Authors:  H Stanislaw; N Todorov
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  1999-02

Review 2.  Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactions.

Authors:  S Shimojo; L Shams
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas.

Authors:  Thomas W James; G Keith Humphrey; Joseph S Gati; Philip Servos; Ravi S Menon; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  What aspects of vision facilitate haptic processing?

Authors:  Susanna Millar; Zainab Al-Attar
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Children's haptic and cross-modal recognition with familiar and unfamiliar objects.

Authors:  E W Bushnell; C Baxt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Long-term memory for pictures under conditions of thematically related foils.

Authors:  D Homa; C Viera
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-09

8.  Efficiently measuring recognition performance with sparse data.

Authors:  Lael J Schooler; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-02

9.  Identifying objects by touch: an "expert system".

Authors:  R L Klatzky; S J Lederman; V A Metzger
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-04

10.  Do vision and haptics share common representations? Implicit and explicit memory within and between modalities.

Authors:  R D Easton; K Srinivas; A J Greene
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  2 in total

1.  Early blindness modulates haptic object recognition.

Authors:  Fabrizio Leo; Monica Gori; Alessandra Sciutti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 2.  Visuo-haptic multisensory object recognition, categorization, and representation.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; K Sathian
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.