| Literature DB >> 18566819 |
Yi Li1, Juha O Rinne, Lisa Mosconi, Elizabeth Pirraglia, Henry Rusinek, Susan DeSanti, Nina Kemppainen, Kjell Någren, Byeong-Chae Kim, Wai Tsui, Mony J de Leon.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to compare the diagnostic value of regional sampling of the cerebral metabolic rate of glucose metabolism (MRglc) using [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose ([18F]FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) and amyloid-beta pathology using Pittsburgh Compound-B ([11C]PIB)-PET in the evaluation of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) compared to normal elderly (NL).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18566819 PMCID: PMC2693402 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-008-0833-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ISSN: 1619-7070 Impact factor: 9.236
Subjects’ characteristics
| Subjects | NL | MCI | AD |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 13 | 17 | |
| Age in years [range] | 69.1 (5.4) [59–74] | 71.6 (4.6) [64-80] | 72 (4.7) [59-79] |
| Education (years) | 9.9 (2.9) | 10.8 (3.8) | 9.7 (4.0) |
| Mini Mental State Exam [range] | 28.9 (0.9) [28–30] | 27.6 ( 1.4) [25–29] | 23.6 ( 2.9) *,** [17–27] |
| Gender (% female) | 71% | 31% | 53% |
Values are mean (SD).
*Significantly different from NL, p < 0.05
**Significantly different from MCI, p < 0.05
Fig. 1Scatter plots showing regional cerebellar adjusted MRglc (umol/100 g/min) for the HIP, MFG, IP, and PPC in NL, MCI, and AD groups. The horizontal lines show the group means
FDG-PET MRglc data by diagnostic group
| Region | NL | MCI | AD |
|---|---|---|---|
| APu | 28.4 (1.31) | 26.7 (0.98) | 26.1 (0.86) |
| GM | 21.6 (0.63) | 19.7 (0.47) | 19.2 (0.41)* |
| HIP | 20.4 (0.79) | 17.6 (0.59)* | 14.3 (0.52)*,** |
| IP | 23.7 (0.87) | 21.0 (0.65)* | 20.1 (0.57)* |
| MFG | 26.0 (0.99) | 23.2 (0.75) | 23.0 (0.65)* |
| PCC | 25.8 (0.98) | 23.0 (0.74) | 21.4 (0.64)* |
| STG | 22.2 (0.96) | 20.0 (0.72) | 19.8 (0.63) |
| TH | 27.9 (1.42) | 26.9 (1.06) | 25.7 (0.93) |
Values are mean (SD) of covariate adjusted values.
APu Anterior putamen, GM gray matter, HIP hippocampus, IP inferior parietal lobule, MFG middle frontal gyrus, PCC posterior cingulate cortex, STG superior temporal gyrus, TH thalamus
*Significantly different from NL, p < 0.05
**Significantly different from MCI, p < 0.05
Fig. 2Scatter plots showing regional PIB binding from the ROI analysis in the hippocampus, MFG, IP, and PPC in subjects with NL, MCI, and AD. The small horizontal lines show the groups mean values. The large horizontal line shows for reference purposes the DVR set to 1.4
PIB-PET DVR data by diagnostic group
| Region | NL | MCI | MCI:NL ratio | AD | AD:NL ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APu | 1.21 (0.11) | 1.67 (0.50) | 1.38 | 1.99 (0.42)* | 1.64 |
| GM | 1.12 (0.09) | 1.29 (0.22) | 1.15 | 1.54 (0.24)*,** | 1.38 |
| HIP | 1.03 (0.11) | 1.02 (0.11) | 0.99 | 1.08 (0.16) | 1.05 |
| IP | 1.19 (0.12) | 1.48 (0.35) | 1.24 | 1.82 (0.35)*,** | 1.53 |
| MFG | 1.16 (0.09) | 1.50 (0.36) | 1.29 | 1.92 (0.36)*,** | 1.66 |
| PCC | 1.26 (0.14) | 1.58 (0.38) | 1.25 | 1.93 (0.39)*,** | 1.53 |
| STG | 1.15 (0.13) | 1.36 (0.32) | 1.18 | 1.67 (0.30)*,** | 1.45 |
| TH | 1.38 (0.12) | 1.44 (0.30) | 1.04 | 1.64 (0.23) | 1.19 |
*AD Significantly different from NL, p < 0.05
**AD Significantly different from MCI, p < 0.05
Fig. 3PIB and FDG-PET scans from two representative subjects: a A 71-year-old male AD subject, GDS 5, MMSE 19; b a 65-year-old male NL subject, GDS 1, MMSE 29. Top row: PIB-PET images; bottom row: co-registered FDG-PET images. PET scans are displayed in the axial plane, from the top to the bottom of the brain, at the level of the centrum-semiovale (left), basal ganglia (center), and medial temporal lobe (right)
Fig. 4Mean MCI and AD Z-scores relative to NL. The most significantly affected region for FDG is the hippocampus and for PIB, frontal neo-cortex
Diagnosis classification accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity (%) of PIB-PET and FDG-PET
| Region | NL vs. AD | NL vs. MCI | MCI vs. AD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | SS | SP | A | SS | SP | A | SS | SP | |
| PIB-PET | |||||||||
| APu | 70 | 62 | 86 | – | – | – | |||
| HIP | 96 | 94 | 100 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| IP | – | – | – | 70 | 54 | 100 | 73 | 94 | 54 |
| MFG | 96 | 94 | 100 | ||||||
| PCC | 60 | 54 | 71 | 73 | 94 | 54 | |||
| STG | 88 | 94 | 71 | – | – | – | 67 | 65 | 69 |
| FDG-PET | |||||||||
| APu | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| HIP | |||||||||
| IP | 83 | 88 | 71 | 75 | 77 | 71 | – | – | – |
| MFG | 79 | 76 | 86 | 80 | 92 | 57 | – | – | – |
| PCC | 88 | 88 | 86 | 70 | 62 | 86 | – | – | – |
| STG | 79 | 82 | 71 | 70 | 69 | 71 | – | – | – |
The most significant region was labeled by bold font and “–” stand for nonsignificant.
A Accuracy, SS sensitivity, SP specificity, APu anterior putamen, HIP hippocampus, MFG middle frontal gyrus, IP inferior parietal lobe, PCC posterior cingulate cortex, STG superior temporal gyrus
Fig. 5Scatter plots showing the combined use of PIB of MFG and FDG of HIP on the classification of the NL, MCI, and AD groups
Subject characteristics of NL and AD in the FDG-PET validation study
| Subjects | NL | AD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34 | 15 | |||||
| Age (years) | 54 (19) [21–80] | 72 (3) [65–77] | ||||
| Gender (%F) | 69% | 65% | ||||
| MMSE | 29.4 (2.6) [28–30] | 23.6 (2.9) [17–27] | ||||
| MRglc μmol/100 g/min | Automated ROIs | Manual ROIs | PVC manual ROIs | Automated ROIs | Manual ROIs | PVC manual ROIs |
| IP | 46.7 (7.7) | 42.7 (6.8) | 47.1 (7.1) | 21.0 (4.4) | 19.2 (4.1) | 21.7 (4.6) |
| MFG | 49.7 (9.3) | 44.1 (7.9) | 48.1 (8.3) | 24.0 (5.3) | 22.1 (4.5) | 25.0 (5.2) |
| PCC | 48.1 (8.7) | 47.3 (8.1) | 51.1 (8.2) | 22.4 (4.2) | 23.0 (5.1) | 26.4 (5.6) |
| STP | 40.7 (5.9) | 38.4 (5.6) | 42.1 (5.6) | 20.4 (4.2) | 20.1 (3.5) | 22.7 (4.0) |
Values are mean (SD) [range].
PVC Partial volume correction, IP inferior parietal lobe, MFG middle frontal gyrus, PCC posterior cingulate cortex, STG superior temporal gyrus
Comparison of manual and automatic template ROIs in the PIB-PET validation study
| PIB DVR (n=15) | Automated ROIs | Manual ROIs | PVC manual ROIs |
|---|---|---|---|
| IP | 1.90 (0.52) | 1.89 (0.46) | 2.13 (0.52) |
| MFG | 2.00 (0.52) | 1.89 (0.45) | 2.15 (0.50) |
| PCC | 2.03 (0.56) | 2.03 (0.62) | 2.32 (0.68) |
| STP | 1.78 (0.40) | 1.81 (0.37) | 1.96 (0.40) |
Values are mean (SD) [range].
PVC Partial volume correction, IP inferior parietal lobe, MFG middle frontal gyrus, PCC posterior cingulate cortex, STG superior temporal gyrus