Literature DB >> 18566504

A comparative study of three techniques for diameter selective fiber activation in the vagal nerve: anodal block, depolarizing prepulses and slowly rising pulses.

Aleksandra Vuckovic1, Marco Tosato, Johannes J Struijk.   

Abstract

The paper shows selective smaller fiber activation in the left and right vagal nerve in in vivo experiments in pigs using three different techniques: anodal block, depolarizing prepulses and slowly rising pulses. All stimulation techniques were performed with the same experimental setup. The techniques have been compared in relation to maximum achievable suppression of nerve activity, maximum required current, maximum achievable stimulation frequency and the required charge per phase. Suppression of the largest fiber activity (expressed as a percentage of the maximum response) was 0-40% for anodal block, 10-25% for depolarizing prepulses and 40-50% for slowly rising pulses (duration up to 5 ms). Incomplete suppression of activation was mainly attributed to the large size of the vagal nerve (3.0-3.5 mA) which resulted in a large difference of the excitation thresholds of nerve fibers at different distances from the electrode, as well as a relatively short duration of slowly rising pulses. The technique of anodal block required the highest currents. The techniques of slowly rising pulses and anodal block required comparable charge per phase that was larger than for the technique of depolarizing prepulses. Depolarizing prepulses were an optimal choice regarding maximum required current and charge per phase but were very sensitive to small changes of the current amplitude. The other two techniques were more robust regarding small changes of stimulation parameters. The maximum stimulation frequency, using typical values of stimulation parameters, was 105 Hz for depolarizing prepulses, 30 Hz for anodal block and 28 Hz for slowly rising pulses. Only a technique of depolarizing prepulses had a charge per phase within the safe limits. For the other two techniques it would be necessary to optimize the shape of a stimulation pulse in order to reduce the charge per phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18566504     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/5/3/002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  11 in total

1.  Towards Closed-Loop Neuromodulation: A Wireless Miniaturized Neural Implant SoC.

Authors:  Wentai Liu; Po-Min Wang; Yi-Kai Lo
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-05-18

Review 2.  Selective Neuromodulation of the Vagus Nerve.

Authors:  Adam Fitchett; Svetlana Mastitskaya; Kirill Aristovich
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Alternative paradigm of selective vagus nerve stimulation tested on an isolated porcine vagus nerve.

Authors:  Polona Pečlin; Janez Rozman
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-06

4.  Differential hemodynamic and respiratory responses to right and left cervical vagal nerve stimulation in rats.

Authors:  Harald M Stauss
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-04

5.  Sources of off-target effects of vagus nerve stimulation using the helical clinical lead in domestic pigs.

Authors:  Evan N Nicolai; Megan L Settell; Bruce E Knudsen; Andrea L McConico; Brian A Gosink; James K Trevathan; Ian W Baumgart; Erika K Ross; Nicole A Pelot; Warren M Grill; Kenneth J Gustafson; Andrew J Shoffstall; Justin C Williams; Kip A Ludwig
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 6.  Selective Vagus Nerve Stimulation as a Therapeutic Approach for the Treatment of ARDS: A Rationale for Neuro-Immunomodulation in COVID-19 Disease.

Authors:  Svetlana Mastitskaya; Nicole Thompson; David Holder
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 7.  How Is the Norepinephrine System Involved in the Antiepileptic Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation?

Authors:  Alexandre Berger; Simone Vespa; Laurence Dricot; Manon Dumoulin; Evelina Iachim; Pascal Doguet; Gilles Vandewalle; Riëm El Tahry
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Preferential activation of small cutaneous fibers through small pin electrode also depends on the shape of a long duration electrical current.

Authors:  Rosa Hugosdottir; Carsten Dahl Mørch; Ole Kæseler Andersen; Thordur Helgason; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation-Induced Laryngeal Motor Evoked Potentials: A Possible Biomarker of Effective Nerve Activation.

Authors:  Simone Vespa; Lars Stumpp; Charlotte Bouckaert; Jean Delbeke; Hugo Smets; Joaquin Cury; Susana Ferrao Santos; Herbert Rooijakkers; Antoine Nonclercq; Robrecht Raedt; Kristl Vonck; Riëm El Tahry
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Anodal block permits directional vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Umair Ahmed; Yao-Chuan Chang; Marina Cracchiolo; Maria F Lopez; Jacquelyn N Tomaio; Timir Datta-Chaudhuri; Theodoros P Zanos; Loren Rieth; Yousef Al-Abed; Stavros Zanos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.