Literature DB >> 18566278

Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine "the moral sentiments": evidence from economic experiments.

Samuel Bowles1.   

Abstract

High-performance organizations and economies work on the basis not only of material interests but also of Adam Smith's "moral sentiments." Well-designed laws and public policies can harness self-interest for the common good. However, incentives that appeal to self-interest may fail when they undermine the moral values that lead people to act altruistically or in other public-spirited ways. Behavioral experiments reviewed here suggest that economic incentives may be counterproductive when they signal that selfishness is an appropriate response; constitute a learning environment through which over time people come to adopt more self-interested motivations; compromise the individual's sense of self-determination and thereby degrade intrinsic motivations; or convey a message of distrust, disrespect, and unfair intent. Many of these unintended effects of incentives occur because people act not only to acquire economic goods and services but also to constitute themselves as dignified, autonomous, and moral individuals. Good organizational and institutional design can channel the material interests for the achievement of social goals while also enhancing the contribution of the moral sentiments to the same ends.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18566278     DOI: 10.1126/science.1152110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  33 in total

1.  From Paper to Forest: Local Motives for Participation in Different Conservation Initiatives. Case Studies in Southeastern Mexico.

Authors:  María Elena Méndez-López; Eduardo García-Frapolli; Isabel Ruiz-Mallén; Luciana Porter-Bolland; Victoria Reyes-Garcia
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Neural dynamics of social tie formation in economic decision-making.

Authors:  Nadège Bault; Benjamin Pelloux; Johannes J Fahrenfort; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Frans van Winden
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Understanding and applying principles of social cognition and decision making in adaptive environmental governance.

Authors:  Daniel A DeCaro; Craig Anthony Tony Arnol; Emmanuel Frimpong Boama; Ahjond S Garmestani
Journal:  Ecol Soc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.403

Review 4.  The social motivation theory of autism.

Authors:  Coralie Chevallier; Gregor Kohls; Vanessa Troiani; Edward S Brodkin; Robert T Schultz
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Managing the urban commons: the relative influence of individual and social incentives on the treatment of public space.

Authors:  Daniel Tumminelli O'Brien
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-12

6.  Payment for Environmental Services: Hypotheses and Evidence.

Authors:  Lee J Alston; Krister Andersson; Steven M Smith
Journal:  Annu Rev Resour Economics       Date:  2013-06-01

7.  Cruel to be kind but not cruel for cash: Harm aversion in the dictator game.

Authors:  Pri Perera; Emina Canic; Elliot A Ludvig
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

8.  A human-centered framework for innovation in conservation incentive programs.

Authors:  Michael G Sorice; C Josh Donlan
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.129

9.  Group decisions in biodiversity conservation: implications from game theory.

Authors:  David M Frank; Sahotra Sarkar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cooperation under indirect reciprocity and imitative trust.

Authors:  Serguei Saavedra; David Smith; Felix Reed-Tsochas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.