Literature DB >> 18565891

Minimal residual disease values discriminate between low and high relapse risk in children with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia and an intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21: the Austrian and German acute lymphoblastic leukemia Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (ALL-BFM) trials.

Andishe Attarbaschi1, Georg Mann, Renate Panzer-Grümayer, Silja Röttgers, Manuel Steiner, Margit König, Eva Csinady, Michael N Dworzak, Markus Seidel, Dasa Janousek, Anja Möricke, Carsten Reichelt, Jochen Harbott, Martin Schrappe, Helmut Gadner, Oskar A Haas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to identify relapse predictors in children with a B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and an intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 (iAMP21), a novel genetic entity associated with poor outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We screened 1,625 patients who were enrolled onto the Austrian and German ALL-Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (ALL-BFM) trials 86, 90, 95, and 2000 with ETV6/RUNX1-specific fluorescent in situ hybridization probes, and we identified 29 patient cases (2%) who had an iAMP21. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was quantified with clone-specific immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were good responders to prednisone, and all achieved remission after induction therapy. Eleven patients experienced relapse, which included eight who experienced relapse after cessation of front-line therapy. Six-year event-free and overall survival rates were 37% +/- 14% and 66% +/- 11%, respectively. Results of MRD analysis were available in 24 (83%) of 29 patients: nine (37.5%) belonged to the low-risk, 14 (58.5%) to the intermediate-risk, and one (4%) to the high-risk group. MRD results were available in 8 of 11 patients who experienced a relapse. Seven occurred among the 14 intermediate-risk patients, and one occurred in the high-risk patient.
CONCLUSION: The overall and early relapse rates in the BFM study were lower than that in a previous United Kingdom Medical Research Council/Childhood Leukemia Working Party study (38% v 61% and 27% v 47%, respectively), which might result from more intensive induction and early reintensification therapy in the ALL-BFM protocols. MRD values were the only reliable parameter to discriminate between a low and high risk of relapse (P = .02).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18565891     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.1117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  35 in total

1.  Six cases of rare gene amplifications and multiple copy of fusion gene in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Irén Haltrich; Monika Csóka; Gábor Kovács; Dóra Török; Donát Alpár; Gábor Ottoffy; György Fekete
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 2.  Beyond the 2008 World Health Organization classification: the role of the hematopathology laboratory in the diagnosis and management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Stephanie McGregor; Jennifer McNeer; Sandeep Gurbuxani
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 3.  Updates in the Pathology of Precursor Lymphoid Neoplasms in the Revised Fourth Edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues.

Authors:  Christopher Wenzinger; Eli Williams; Alejandro A Gru
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.952

4.  Minimal residual disease analysis by eight-color flow cytometry in relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Leonid Karawajew; Michael Dworzak; Richard Ratei; Peter Rhein; Giuseppe Gaipa; Barbara Buldini; Giuseppe Basso; Ondrej Hrusak; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Günter Henze; Karl Seeger; Arend von Stackelberg; Ester Mejstrikova; Cornelia Eckert
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 5.  Biology, risk stratification, and therapy of pediatric acute leukemias: an update.

Authors:  Ching-Hon Pui; William L Carroll; Soheil Meshinchi; Robert J Arceci
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Minimal residual disease diagnostics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: need for sensitive, fast, and standardized technologies.

Authors:  Jacques J M van Dongen; Vincent H J van der Velden; Monika Brüggemann; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Integrative genomic analysis of B-lymphoblastic lymphoma with intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21.

Authors:  Richa Sharma; Matthew M Klairmont; Ashley C Holland; John K Choi; Charles G Mullighan; Lu Wang; John T Sandlund; Ching-Hon Pui; Hiroto Inaba
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 8.  Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  Hiroto Inaba; Mel Greaves; Charles G Mullighan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Possible Mitochondria-Associated Enzymatic Role in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Residual Disease.

Authors:  Ian Kusao; David Troelstrup; Bruce Shiramizu
Journal:  Cancer Growth Metastasis       Date:  2008-11-24

10.  The Eleventh International Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Workshop Report: Ponte di Legno, Italy, 6-7 May 2009.

Authors:  A Biondi; A Baruchel; S Hunger; G Masera; K Schmiegelow; M Schrappe; C H Pui
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 11.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.