Literature DB >> 18565758

Mass spectrometry of protein-ligand complexes: enhanced gas-phase stability of ribonuclease-nucleotide complexes.

Sheng Yin1, Yongming Xie, Joseph A Loo.   

Abstract

Noncovalent protein-ligand complexes are readily detected by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). Ligand binding stoichiometry can be determined easily by the ESI-MS method. The ability to detect noncovalent protein-ligand complexes depends, however, on the stability of the complexes in the gas-phase environment. Solution binding affinities may or may not be accurate predictors of their stability in vacuo. Complexes composed of cytidine nucleotides bound to ribonuclease A (RNase A) and ribonuclease S (RNase S) were detected by ESI-MS and were further analyzed by MS/MS. RNase A and RNase S share similar structures and biological activity. Subtilisin-cleavage of RNase A yields an S-peptide and an S-protein; the S-peptide and S-protein interact through hydrophobic interactions with a solution binding constant in the nanomolar range to generate an active RNase S. Cytidine nucleotides bind to the ribonucleases through electrostatic interactions with a solution binding constant in the micromolar range. Collisionally activated dissociation (CAD) of the 1:1 RNase A-CDP and CTP complexes yields cleavage of the covalent phosphate bonds of the nucleotide ligands, releasing CMP from the complex. CAD of the RNase S-CDP and CTP complexes dissociates the S-peptide from the remaining S-protein/nucleotide complex; further dissociation of the S-protein/nucleotide complex fragments a covalent phosphate bond of the nucleotide with subsequent release of CMP. Despite a solution binding constant favoring the S-protein/S-peptide complex, CDP/CTP remains electrostatically bound to the S-protein in the gas-phase dissociation experiment. This study highlights the intrinsic stability of electrostatic interactions in the gas phase and the significant differences in solution and gas-phase stabilities of noncovalent complexes that can result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18565758      PMCID: PMC2564874          DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  40 in total

1.  Ribonuclease A.

Authors:  Ronald T. Raines
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1998-05-07       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Hydrophobic component in noncovalent binding of fusion peptides to lipids as observed by electrospray mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Yan Li; Frederic Heitz; Christian Le Grimellec; Richard B Cole
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Method for distinguishing specific from nonspecific protein-ligand complexes in nanoelectrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Jiangxiao Sun; Elena N Kitova; Weijie Wang; John S Klassen
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  20S proteasomes have the potential to keep substrates in store for continual degradation.

Authors:  Michal Sharon; Susanne Witt; Karin Felderer; Beate Rockel; Wolfgang Baumeister; Carol V Robinson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Free energies of protein-protein association determined by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry correlate accurately with values obtained by solution methods.

Authors:  Sanjay R Krishnaswamy; Evan R Williams; Jack F Kirsch
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 6.  The role of mass spectrometry in structure elucidation of dynamic protein complexes.

Authors:  Michal Sharon; Carol V Robinson
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  Sizing large proteins and protein complexes by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and ion mobility.

Authors:  Catherine S Kaddis; Shirley H Lomeli; Sheng Yin; Beniam Berhane; Marcin I Apostol; Valerie A Kickhoefer; Leonard H Rome; Joseph A Loo
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  A deconvolution method for the separation of specific versus nonspecific interactions in noncovalent protein-ligand complexes analyzed by ESI-FT-ICR mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Thorsten Daubenfeld; Anne-Pascale Bouin; Guillaume van der Rest
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 9.  Studying noncovalent protein complexes by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  J A Loo
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 10.946

10.  A study of noncovalent complexes involving single-stranded DNA and polybasic compounds using nanospray mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Peran Terrier; Jeanine Tortajada; William Buchmann
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.109

View more
  33 in total

1.  Reliable determinations of protein-ligand interactions by direct ESI-MS measurements. Are we there yet?

Authors:  Elena N Kitova; Amr El-Hawiet; Paul D Schnier; John S Klassen
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Mapping a noncovalent protein-peptide interface by top-down FTICR mass spectrometry using electron capture dissociation.

Authors:  David J Clarke; Euan Murray; Ted Hupp; C Logan Mackay; Pat R R Langridge-Smith
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Identifying Unknown Enzyme-Substrate Pairs from the Cellular Milieu with Native Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Kalli C Catcott; Jing Yan; Wanlu Qu; Vicki H Wysocki; Zhaohui Sunny Zhou
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.164

4.  Top-Down Mass Spectrometry of Supercharged Native Protein-Ligand Complexes.

Authors:  Sheng Yin; Joseph A Loo
Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Stepwise evolution of protein native structure with electrospray into the gas phase, 10(-12) to 10(2) s.

Authors:  Kathrin Breuker; Fred W McLafferty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Integrating Native Mass Spectrometry and Top-Down MS for Defining Protein Interactions Important in Biology and Medicine.

Authors:  Joseph A Loo; Sabrina A Benchaar; Jiang Zhang
Journal:  Mass Spectrom (Tokyo)       Date:  2013-04-15

7.  Native Top-Down Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility MS for Characterizing the Cobalt and Manganese Metal Binding of α-Synuclein Protein.

Authors:  Piriya Wongkongkathep; Jong Yoon Han; Tae Su Choi; Sheng Yin; Hugh I Kim; Joseph A Loo
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Collision induced unfolding of protein ions in the gas phase studied by ion mobility-mass spectrometry: the effect of ligand binding on conformational stability.

Authors:  Jonathan T S Hopper; Neil J Oldham
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Salt Bridge Rearrangement (SaBRe) Explains the Dissociation Behavior of Noncovalent Complexes.

Authors:  Rachel R Ogorzalek Loo; Joseph A Loo
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.109

10.  Quantifying protein-fatty acid interactions using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Lan Liu; Elena N Kitova; John S Klassen
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.109

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.