OBJECTIVE: To gain an in depth understanding of the experiences of care of men with prostate cancer and their partners. METHODS: The study design was a qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews of men (35) who had been diagnosed and treated for prostate cancer and their partners (10). They were recruited from two hospitals in the East Midlands of England and two charities. RESULTS: The interviews showed that although there was no widespread dissatisfaction with care, patients reported problems throughout care. The two main problems were that throughout care patients' and partners' information needs were often not identified or met, and patients' preferred role in decision-making about testing and treatment was not explored. CONCLUSIONS: If patients' experiences of prostate cancer care are to be improved, clinicians need to identify, and respond to, the information and decision-making needs of individual patients and their partners. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians should identify and meet the needs of patients individually, use appropriate language and formats for communicating information, fully prepare patients for tests, explore and meet the needs of patients for involvement in decision-making, and recognise the important role that their partner plays. Systems and pathways of care should be designed to enable patients and partners to obtain information and participate in decision-making throughout all stages of care.
OBJECTIVE: To gain an in depth understanding of the experiences of care of men with prostate cancer and their partners. METHODS: The study design was a qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews of men (35) who had been diagnosed and treated for prostate cancer and their partners (10). They were recruited from two hospitals in the East Midlands of England and two charities. RESULTS: The interviews showed that although there was no widespread dissatisfaction with care, patients reported problems throughout care. The two main problems were that throughout care patients' and partners' information needs were often not identified or met, and patients' preferred role in decision-making about testing and treatment was not explored. CONCLUSIONS: If patients' experiences of prostate cancer care are to be improved, clinicians need to identify, and respond to, the information and decision-making needs of individual patients and their partners. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians should identify and meet the needs of patients individually, use appropriate language and formats for communicating information, fully prepare patients for tests, explore and meet the needs of patients for involvement in decision-making, and recognise the important role that their partner plays. Systems and pathways of care should be designed to enable patients and partners to obtain information and participate in decision-making throughout all stages of care.
Authors: Yael Symes; Lixin Song; Rachael G Heineman; Brittney D Barbosa; Kimberly Tatum; Giselle Greene; Mark Weaver; Ronald C Chen Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Jerome Gnanaraj; Shobana Balakrishnan; Zarish Umar; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Christian P Pavlovich; Scott M Wright; Waseem Khaliq Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Lixin Song; Ronald C Chen; Jeannette T Bensen; George J Knafl; Matthew E Nielsen; Laura Farnan; Eric M Wallen; Merle Mishel; Raj S Pruthi; James L Mohler; Paul A Godley Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Trent Jackson; Kimberly Davis; Lisa Haisfield; David Dawson; John Lynch; James Regan; Arnold Kwart; Barlow Lynch; Kathryn Taylor Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2009-09-22
Authors: Carolyn Tarrant; Richard Baker; Andrew M Colman; Paul Sinfield; Shona Agarwal; John K Mellon; William Steward; Roger Kockelbergh Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-11-04 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell; Phyllis Butow; Stella Bu; Alana Fisher; Ilona Juraskova Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-04-30 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Paul Sinfield; Richard Baker; Carolyn Tarrant; Shona Agarwal; Andrew M Colman; William Steward; Roger Kockelbergh; John K Mellon Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-12-11 Impact factor: 2.655