Literature DB >> 18564389

Transfusion recipient epidemiology and outcomes research: possibilities for the future.

Christopher D Hillyer1, Neil Blumberg, Simone A Glynn, Paul M Ness.   

Abstract

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) supports major research programs related to the field of transfusion medicine, which encompass blood banking, the practice of transfusion medicine itself, and cellular therapies. Specific programmatic elements have included 1) the Transfusion Medicine/Hemostasis Clinical Trials Network (TMH CTN) charged with conducting clinical trials in transfusion medicine and hemostasis; 2) the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study-II (REDS-II), which includes domestic and international efforts dedicated to blood donor safety and blood availability issues; 3) the Specialized Centers of Clinically Oriented Research (SCCOR) in Transfusion Biology and Medicine that include two major projects, the Biologic and Immunologic Aspects of Transfusion Medicine Program and the Transfusion and Lung Injury Program, and 4) the Transfusion Therapy Trial for Functional Outcomes in Cardiovascular Patients Undergoing Surgical Hip Fracture Repair (FOCUS), a Phase III clinical trial that has as its major goal to determine whether a more aggressive transfusion strategy in surgery patients with cardiovascular disease (or risk factors) is associated with improved functional recovery and decreased risk of adverse postoperative outcomes. Notably, none of these programs supports epidemiologic and clinical outcomes research focused on transfusion recipients. Thus, on October 31, 2007, a Working Group on Transfusion Recipient Epidemiology and Outcomes Research was convened by the NHLBI. This group was asked to discuss the current status of the field, identify critical research needs, and make recommendations to the NHLBI program staff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18564389     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01807.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  4 in total

1.  Insufficient nitric oxide bioavailability: a hypothesis to explain adverse effects of red blood cell transfusion.

Authors:  John D Roback; Robert B Neuman; Arshed Quyyumi; Roy Sutliff
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 2.  One size will never fit all: the future of research in pediatric transfusion medicine.

Authors:  Cassandra D Josephson; Traci Heath Mondoro; Daniel R Ambruso; Rosa Sanchez; Steven R Sloan; Naomi L C Luban; John A Widness
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.756

3.  Red blood cell transfusion practices in acute lung injury: what do patient factors contribute?

Authors:  David J Murphy; David Howard; Angela Muriithi; Pedro Mendez-Tellez; Jonathan Sevransky; Carl Shanholtz; Giora Netzer; Peter J Pronovost; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 4.  Hemodynamic Functionality of Transfused Red Blood Cells in the Microcirculation of Blood Recipients.

Authors:  Gregory Barshtein; Dan Arbell; Saul Yedgar
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.