OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between features of the MMSE written sentence and cognitive function, depression and disability. METHODS: MMSE sentences from 191 community dwelling individuals without dementia from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921 (LBC1921) study were: (a) photocopied and (b) typed as written. Sentences were rated for objective criteria: word number and frequency, first person usage, time orientation, and letter case. Twenty healthy raters (50% male, age 20-26 years), blind to all other data, rated each handwritten and typed sentence for subjective criteria: legibility, 'emotional' tone (positive to negative), estimated age, health, and intelligence. As part of the LBC1921 volunteers had results available for cognitive ability tests (from which we extracted a general cognitive ability factor, g), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS), and Townsend disability scores. RESULTS: 43.5% of subjects were male, mean age 78.6, SD 0.43 years. There was no significant association between the objective sentence criteria, legibility or tone and measured cognitive ability or physical disability. However, estimates of intelligence from the MMSE written sentence correlated significantly with current cognitive ability (r = 0.29, p < 0.001). There was a trend towards sentences with a negative tone being associated with a higher HADS-depression score (rho = -0.12, p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: In community dwelling people aged around 80 years, despite no association between objectively rated features of the MMSE sentence and intelligence or disability, raters were able to make better-than-chance estimates of subjects' intelligence test scores. (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between features of the MMSE written sentence and cognitive function, depression and disability. METHODS: MMSE sentences from 191 community dwelling individuals without dementia from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921 (LBC1921) study were: (a) photocopied and (b) typed as written. Sentences were rated for objective criteria: word number and frequency, first person usage, time orientation, and letter case. Twenty healthy raters (50% male, age 20-26 years), blind to all other data, rated each handwritten and typed sentence for subjective criteria: legibility, 'emotional' tone (positive to negative), estimated age, health, and intelligence. As part of the LBC1921 volunteers had results available for cognitive ability tests (from which we extracted a general cognitive ability factor, g), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS), and Townsend disability scores. RESULTS: 43.5% of subjects were male, mean age 78.6, SD 0.43 years. There was no significant association between the objective sentence criteria, legibility or tone and measured cognitive ability or physical disability. However, estimates of intelligence from the MMSE written sentence correlated significantly with current cognitive ability (r = 0.29, p < 0.001). There was a trend towards sentences with a negative tone being associated with a higher HADS-depression score (rho = -0.12, p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: In community dwelling people aged around 80 years, despite no association between objectively rated features of the MMSE sentence and intelligence or disability, raters were able to make better-than-chance estimates of subjects' intelligence test scores. (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Stefan Sniatecki; Gabriele Meyer; Anna Renom-Guiteras; Martin N Dichter; Herbert Mayer; Astrid Stephan Journal: Z Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 1.281
Authors: Adele M Taylor; Danielle Page; Judith A Okely; Janie Corley; Miles Welstead; Barbora Skarabela; Paul Redmond; Tom C Russ; Simon R Cox Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 3.240