Literature DB >> 18563848

The effect of salt and phage concentrations on the binding sensitivity of magnetoelastic biosensors for Bacillus anthracis detection.

S Huang1, H Yang, R S Lakshmanan, M L Johnson, I Chen, J Wan, H C Wikle, V A Petrenko, J M Barbaree, Z Y Cheng, B A Chin.   

Abstract

This article presents an investigation of the effect of salt and phage concentrations on the binding affinity of magnetoelastic (ME) biosensors. The sensors were fabricated by immobilizing filamentous phage on the ME platform surface for the detection of Bacillus anthracis spores. In response to the binding of spores to the phage on the ME biosensor, a corresponding decrease occurs in resonance frequency. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to verify the structure of phage under different combinations of salt/phage concentration. The chemistry of the phage solution alters phage bundling characteristics and, hence, influences both the sensitivity and detection limit of the ME biosensors. The frequency responses of the sensors were measured to determine the effects of salt concentration on the sensors' performance. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to confirm and quantify the binding of spores to the sensor surface. This showed that 420 mM salt at a phage concentration of 1 x 10(11) vir/mL results in an optimal distribution of immobilized phages on the sensor surface, consequently promoting better binding of spores to the biosensor's surface. Additionally, the sensors immobilized with phage under this condition were exposed to B. anthracis spores in different concentrations ranging from 5 x 10(1) to 5 x 10(8) cfu/mL in a flowing system. The results showed that the sensitivity of this ME biosensor was 202 Hz/decade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18563848     DOI: 10.1002/bit.21995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  6 in total

1.  The Virulence Index: A Metric for Quantitative Analysis of Phage Virulence.

Authors:  Zachary J Storms; Matthew R Teel; Kevin Mercurio; Dominic Sauvageau
Journal:  Phage (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-02-25

2.  Surface-immobilization of chromatographically purified bacteriophages for the optimized capture of bacteria.

Authors:  Ravendra Naidoo; Amit Singh; Sunil K Arya; Bernadette Beadle; Nick Glass; Jamshid Tanha; Christine M Szymanski; Stephane Evoy
Journal:  Bacteriophage       Date:  2012-01-01

3.  A magnetoelastic biosensor based on E2 glycoprotein for wireless detection of classical swine fever virus E2 antibody.

Authors:  Xing Guo; Shengbo Sang; Jinyu Guo; Aoqun Jian; Qianqian Duan; Jianlong Ji; Qiang Zhang; Wendong Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Phage-based Electrochemical Sensors: A Review.

Authors:  Jingting Xu; Ying Chau; Yi-Kuen Lee
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 2.891

5.  Microencapsulation of Clostridium difficile specific bacteriophages using microfluidic glass capillary devices for colon delivery using pH triggered release.

Authors:  Gurinder K Vinner; Goran T Vladisavljević; Martha R J Clokie; Danish J Malik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Wireless Biological Electronic Sensors.

Authors:  Yue Cui
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.