Literature DB >> 18563677

Swing kinematics for male and female pro golfers.

N Zheng1, S W Barrentine, G S Fleisig, J R Andrews.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare golf swing kinematics between female and male professional golfers, with particular focus on areas where different risks of injury exist and variables that may be related to driving distance. Twenty-five LPGA golfers and twenty-five PGA golfers were tested. Customized computer software was developed to analyze kinematic data obtained with an optoelectronic system at 240 Hz. At the peak of back swing, significant differences were found in trunk forward tilt (LPGA: 25 +/- 4 degrees and PGA: 31 +/- 4 degrees ), and in pelvis orientation (LPGA: 49 +/- 8 degrees and PGA: 42 +/- 7 degrees ). Significantly different pelvis rotation at the ball impact was found (LPGA: - 52 +/- 11 degrees and PGA: - 42 +/- 12 degrees ). The LPGA group produced significantly less angular velocities of the club shaft (2049 +/- 512 degrees /s), the left wrist (816 +/- 186 degrees /s), the right wrist (864 +/- 198 degrees /s) and the elbow extension (705 +/- 109 degrees /s) than the PGA group. The results of this study show there are differences in the swing mechanics for men and women at the professional level. Major differences were found at the wrist and elbow, where different incidences of injury were previously reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18563677     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1038732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  9 in total

1.  Biomechanical Effects of Ball Position on Address Position Variables of Elite Golfers.

Authors:  Sung Eun Kim; Young-Chul Koh; Joon-Haeng Cho; Sae Yong Lee; Hae-Dong Lee; Sung-Cheol Lee
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  Golf Swing Biomechanics: A Systematic Review and Methodological Recommendations for Kinematics.

Authors:  Maxime Bourgain; Philippe Rouch; Olivier Rouillon; Patricia Thoreux; Christophe Sauret
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 3.  The Biomechanics of the Modern Golf Swing: Implications for Lower Back Injuries.

Authors:  Michael H Cole; Paul N Grimshaw
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Improving performance in golf: current research and implications from a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Kerrie Evans; Neil Tuttle
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Kinematic relationship between rotation of lumbar spine and hip joints during golf swing in professional golfers.

Authors:  Frederick Mun; Seung Woo Suh; Hyun-Joon Park; Ahnryul Choi
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Golf Swing Rotational Velocity: The Essential Follow-Through.

Authors:  Katherine M Steele; Eugene Y Roh; Gordhan Mahtani; David W Meister; Amy L Ladd; Jessica Rose
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2018-10-31

7.  Small changes in ball position at address cause a chain effect in golf swing.

Authors:  Sung Eun Kim; Jangyun Lee; Sae Yong Lee; Hae-Dong Lee; Jae Kun Shim; Sung-Cheol Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Kinematic evaluation of movement smoothness in golf: relationship between the normalized jerk cost of body joints and the clubhead.

Authors:  Ahnryul Choi; Su-Bin Joo; Euichaul Oh; Joung Hwan Mun
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Golf Swing Segmentation from a Single IMU Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Myeongsub Kim; Sukyung Park
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.