Literature DB >> 18562968

The importance of walking to public health.

I-Min Lee1, David M Buchner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is clear evidence that physical activity, including walking, has substantial benefits for health. This article, prepared as part of the proceedings of a conference on walking and health, discusses the type of walking that produces substantial health benefits, considers several methodological issues pertinent to epidemiologic studies investigating the association of walking and health, and reviews some of the reasons for the large public health importance of walking.
METHODS: Review of the available literature. Due to space constraints, this is not intended to be a comprehensive review; instead, selected studies are cited to illustrate the points raised.
RESULTS: Walking as a healthful form of physical activity began to receive attention in the 1990s due to new recommendations that emphasized moderate-intensity physical activity. The main example of moderate-intensity activity in the 1995 Centers for Disease Control/American College of Sports Medicine recommendation was brisk walking at 3 to 4 mph. Evidence for the health benefits of walking comes largely from epidemiologic studies. When interpreting the data from such studies, it is necessary to consider several methodological issues, including the design of the study, confounding by other lifestyle behaviors, and confounding by other kinds of physical activity. Walking has the potential to have a large public health impact due to its accessibility, its documented health benefits, and the fact that effective programs to promote walking already exist.
CONCLUSIONS: Walking is a simple health behavior that can reduce rates of chronic disease and ameliorate rising health care costs, with only a modest increase in the number of activity-related injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18562968     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c65d0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  88 in total

Review 1.  Mobility and aging: new directions for public health action.

Authors:  William A Satariano; Jack M Guralnik; Richard J Jackson; Richard A Marottoli; Elizabeth A Phelan; Thomas R Prohaska
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Burden and Bad Days Among Mexican-Origin Women Caregivers.

Authors:  Carolyn A Mendez-Luck; Katherine P Anthony; Lourdes R Guerrero
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Analyzing Walking Route Choice through Built Environments using Random Forests and Discrete Choice Techniques.

Authors:  Calvin P Tribby; Harvey J Miller; Barbara B Brown; Carol M Werner; Ken R Smith
Journal:  Environ Plan B Urban Anal City Sci       Date:  2016-07-20

4.  Positive messaging promotes walking in older adults.

Authors:  Nanna Notthoff; Laura L Carstensen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2014-06

5.  Do relationships between environmental attributes and recreational walking vary according to area-level socioeconomic status?

Authors:  Takemi Sugiyama; Natasha J Howard; Catherine Paquet; Neil T Coffee; Anne W Taylor; Mark Daniel
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  Efficacy of Contextually Tailored Suggestions for Physical Activity: A Micro-randomized Optimization Trial of HeartSteps.

Authors:  Predrag Klasnja; Shawna Smith; Nicholas J Seewald; Andy Lee; Kelly Hall; Brook Luers; Eric B Hekler; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-05-03

7.  Inequitable walking conditions among older people: examining the interrelationship of neighbourhood socio-economic status and urban form using a comparative case study.

Authors:  Theresa L Grant; Nancy Edwards; Heidi Sveistrup; Caroline Andrew; Mary Egan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Advancing the future of physical activity guidelines in Canada: an independent expert panel interpretation of the evidence.

Authors:  Antero Kesäniemi; Chris J Riddoch; Bruce Reeder; Steven N Blair; Thorkild Ia Sørensen
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Pedometer use among adults at high risk of type 2 diabetes, Finland, 2007-2008.

Authors:  Eveliina E Korkiakangas; Maija A Alahuhta; Päivi M Husman; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; Anja M Taanila; Jaana H Laitinen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  The back 2 activity trial: education and advice versus education and advice plus a structured walking programme for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Suzanne M McDonough; Mark A Tully; Seán R O'Connor; Adele Boyd; Daniel P Kerr; Siobhán M O'Neill; Antony Delitto; Ian Bradbury; Catrine Tudor-Locke; David G Baxter; Deirdre A Hurley
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.