Literature DB >> 18561263

Wild mouse lemurs revisit artificial feeding platforms: implications for field experiments on sensory and cognitive abilities in small primates.

Marine Joly1, Marina Scheumann, Elke Zimmermann.   

Abstract

Dealing effectively with space to find important resources in a natural environment is a fundamental ability necessary for survival. Evidence has already been provided that wild gray mouse lemurs revisit stationary feeding sites regularly. In this study, we explore to what extent two sympatric mouse lemur species, Microcebus murinus and M. ravelobensis, revisited artificial feeding sites during a period of food scarcity. As the tested populations are marked with individual transponders, we built up artificial feeding platforms equipped with a transponder reader at nine different locations where mouse lemurs had been previously caught. We baited them with a liquid reward and recorded the visitors' ID, the time and frequency of their visits, as well as all encounters that occurred on the platforms. Only mouse lemurs visited platforms and a total of sixteen individuals across both species were identified. Mouse lemurs visited a platform with a frequency of 2.02 (+/-0.95, range: 1-3.4) times in a night and they revisited it on several consecutive nights following their first visit (percentage of revisits 90.6%+/-11.7, range: 73.3-100%). First visits on a platform occurred on average 44 min (+/-35; range: 13-131) after sunset. We identified encounters between mouse lemurs on platforms: all of them were agonistic and within a species. Within a dyad, chasers were significantly heavier than chasees (N=7 dyads). Our design of platform experiments offers the advantage of observing wild individually known small primates in their natural environment and of setting up controlled experiments to gain insight into their sensory and cognitive abilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18561263     DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Primatol        ISSN: 0275-2565            Impact factor:   2.371


  4 in total

1.  Do solitary foraging nocturnal mammals plan their routes?

Authors:  Marine Joly; Elke Zimmermann
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Does body posture influence hand preference in an ancestral primate model?

Authors:  Marina Scheumann; Marine Joly-Radko; Lisette Leliveld; Elke Zimmermann
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 3.260

3.  Posture does not matter! Paw usage and grasping paw preference in a small-bodied rooting quadrupedal mammal.

Authors:  Marine Joly; Marina Scheumann; Elke Zimmermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Are generalists more innovative than specialists? A comparison of innovative abilities in two wild sympatric mouse lemur species.

Authors:  Johanna Henke-von der Malsburg; Claudia Fichtel
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.963

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.