Literature DB >> 18560375

The SF-36 walk-wheel: a simple modification of the SF-36 physical domain improves its responsiveness for measuring health status change in spinal cord injury.

B B Lee1, J M Simpson, M T King, M J Haran, O Marial.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity and responsiveness of a modified SF-36 within a spinal cord-injured (SCI) population. STUDY
DESIGN: SF-36 scores collected at baseline and on completion of a randomized controlled trial in 305 patients with SCI and neuropathic bladder.
SETTING: New South Wales, Australia.
METHODS: Subjects were administered the standard SF-36 plus three additional questions, in which 'walk' was replaced with 'wheel' for three of the physical function (PF) questions. Discriminant validity was determined by comparing participants with paraplegia and tetraplegia using the effect size (ES). Responsiveness was assessed in the subset of patients who developed a urinary tract infection (UTI) during the trial using the standardized response mean (SRM).
RESULTS: Compared with the standard SF-36, the SF-36 walk-wheel modification (SF-36ww) increased the mean PF score from 18 to 39 (P<0.001) and the physical composite score from 33 to 37 (P<0.001). Discriminant validity was similar for both versions (PF paraplegia/tetraplegia: ES 1.09(SF-36) vs 1.08(SF-36ww), n=305). Among 138 SCI patients who developed a UTI, the SF-36ww almost doubled PF responsiveness for all neurological levels (SRM increased from 0.36 to 0.68), more so in tetraplegic (SRM, 0.11 vs 0.58; n=77) than paraplegic groups (SRM, 0.77 vs 0.86; n=61).
CONCLUSION: The SF-36ww is a simple, pragmatic modification of the SF-36 PF items, which addresses some problems of content validity and floor effect for SCI subjects and greatly improves responsiveness, particularly for those with tetraplegia. Because it comprises a simple addition to the standard SF-36, external comparisons are preserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18560375     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2008.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  10 in total

1.  The effects of the Nintendo™ Wii Fit on gait, balance, and quality of life in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Tracy Wall; Richard Feinn; Kevin Chui; M Samuel Cheng
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Health state descriptions, valuations and individuals' capacity to walk: a comparative evaluation of preference-based instruments in the context of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  David G T Whitehurst; Nicole Mittmann; Vanessa K Noonan; Marcel F Dvorak; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Low-Force Muscle Activity Regulates Energy Expenditure after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Jessica R Woelfel; Amy L Kimball; Chu-Ling Yen; Richard K Shields
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Effect of intermittent normobaric hyperoxia for treatment of neuropathic pain in Chinese patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Y Gui; H Li; M Zhao; Q Yang; X Kuang
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  "When I saw walking I just kind of took it as wheeling": interpretations of mobility-related items in generic, preference-based health state instruments in the context of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Yvonne Anne Michel; Lidia Engel; Kim Rand-Hendriksen; Liv Ariane Augestad; David Gt Whitehurst
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Computer-Assessed Preference-Based Quality of Life in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Enea Parimbelli; Caterina Pistarini; Gabriella Fizzotti; Carla Rognoni; Giampiero Olivieri; Silvana Quaglini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Satisfaction with life, health and well-being: comparison between non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction, traumatic spinal cord injury and Australian norms.

Authors:  Linda Barclay; Peter W New; Prue E Morgan; Sara J T Guilcher
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2019-05-23

Review 8.  A review and evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures for spasticity in persons with spinal cord damage: Recommendations from the Ability Network - an international initiative.

Authors:  Per Ertzgaard; Anand Nene; Carlotte Kiekens; Anthony S Burns
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 9.  Short Form health surveys and related variants in spinal cord injury research: a systematic review.

Authors:  David G T Whitehurst; Lidia Engel; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Perceptions of individuals living with spinal cord injury toward preference-based quality of life instruments: a qualitative exploration.

Authors:  David G T Whitehurst; Nitya Suryaprakash; Lidia Engel; Nicole Mittmann; Vanessa K Noonan; Marcel F S Dvorak; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.186

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.