PURPOSE: Inactivation of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) represents a promising strategy for the development of selective therapies against epithelial cancers and has been extensively studied as a molecular target for cancer therapy. However, little attention has been paid to remnant cell-associated domains created by cleavage of EGFR ligands. The present study focused on recent findings that cleavage of membrane-anchored heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (proHB-EGF), an EGFR ligand, induces translocation of the carboxyl-terminal fragment (CTF) of HB-EGF from the plasma membrane to the nucleus and regulates cell cycle. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Two gastric cancer cell lines, MKN28 and NUGC4, were used. KB-R7785, an inhibitor of proHB-EGF shedding, was used to suppress HB-EGF-CTF nuclear translocation with cetuximab, which inhibits EGFR phosphorylation. Cell growth was analyzed using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, inner salt assay, apoptosis was evaluated by assay of caspase-3 and caspase-7, and cell cycle was investigated by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Immunofluorescence study confirmed that KB-R7785 inhibited HB-EGF-CTF nuclear translocation under conditions of proHB-EGF shedding induction by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate in gastric cancer cells. KB-R7785 inhibited cell growth in a dose-dependent manner and high-dose KB-R7785 induced apoptosis. Moreover, KB-R7785 induced cell cycle arrest and increased sub-G1 DNA content. KB-R7785 suppressed cyclin A and c-Myc expression. All effects of KB-R7785 were reinforced by combination with cetuximab. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that both inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation and inhibition of HB-EGF-CTF nuclear translocation play crucial roles in inhibitory regulation of cancer cell growth. Suppression of HB-EGF-CTF nuclear translocation might offer a new strategy for treating gastric cancer.
PURPOSE: Inactivation of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) represents a promising strategy for the development of selective therapies against epithelial cancers and has been extensively studied as a molecular target for cancer therapy. However, little attention has been paid to remnant cell-associated domains created by cleavage of EGFR ligands. The present study focused on recent findings that cleavage of membrane-anchored heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (proHB-EGF), an EGFR ligand, induces translocation of the carboxyl-terminal fragment (CTF) of HB-EGF from the plasma membrane to the nucleus and regulates cell cycle. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Two gastric cancer cell lines, MKN28 and NUGC4, were used. KB-R7785, an inhibitor of proHB-EGF shedding, was used to suppress HB-EGF-CTF nuclear translocation with cetuximab, which inhibits EGFR phosphorylation. Cell growth was analyzed using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, inner salt assay, apoptosis was evaluated by assay of caspase-3 and caspase-7, and cell cycle was investigated by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Immunofluorescence study confirmed that KB-R7785 inhibited HB-EGF-CTF nuclear translocation under conditions of proHB-EGF shedding induction by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate in gastric cancer cells. KB-R7785 inhibited cell growth in a dose-dependent manner and high-dose KB-R7785 induced apoptosis. Moreover, KB-R7785 induced cell cycle arrest and increased sub-G1 DNA content. KB-R7785 suppressed cyclin A and c-Myc expression. All effects of KB-R7785 were reinforced by combination with cetuximab. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that both inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation and inhibition of HB-EGF-CTF nuclear translocation play crucial roles in inhibitory regulation of cancer cell growth. Suppression of HB-EGF-CTF nuclear translocation might offer a new strategy for treating gastric cancer.
Authors: Katrine R Schoennemann; Jon K Bjerregaard; Tine P Hansen; Karin De Stricker; Morten F Gjerstorff; Helle A Jensen; Lene W Vestermark; Per Pfeiffer Journal: Gastric Cancer Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 7.370
Authors: F Lordick; B Luber; S Lorenzen; S Hegewisch-Becker; G Folprecht; E Wöll; T Decker; E Endlicher; N Röthling; T Schuster; G Keller; F Fend; C Peschel Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Y Hirata; N Ogasawara; M Sasaki; T Mizushima; T Shimura; T Mizoshita; Y Mori; E Kubota; T Wada; S Tanida; H Kataoka; T Kamiya; S Higashiyama; T Joh Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 7.640