Literature DB >> 18559601

The relative distribution of membranous and cytoplasmic met is a prognostic indicator in stage I and II colon cancer.

Fiona Ginty1, Sudeshna Adak, Ali Can, Michael Gerdes, Melinda Larsen, Harvey Cline, Robert Filkins, Zhengyu Pang, Qing Li, Michael C Montalto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The association hepatocyte growth factor receptor (Met) tyrosine kinase with prognosis and survival in colon cancer is unclear, due in part to the limitation of detection methods used. In particular, conventional chromagenic immunohistochemistry (IHC) has several limitations including the inability to separate compartmental measurements. Measurement of membrane, cytoplasm, and nuclear levels of Met could offer a superior approach to traditional IHC. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Fluorescent-based IHC for Met was done in 583 colon cancer patients in a tissue microarray format. Using curvature and intensity-based image analysis, the membrane, nuclear, and cytoplasm were segmented. Probability distributions of Met within each compartment were determined, and an automated scoring algorithm was generated. An optimal score cutpoint was calculated using 500-fold crossvalidation of a training and test data set. For comparison with conventional IHC, a second array from the same tissue microarray block was 3,3'-diaminobenzidine immunostained for Met.
RESULTS: In crossvalidated and univariate Cox analysis, the membrane relative to cytoplasm Met score was a significant predictor of survival in stage I (hazard ratio, 0.16; P = 0.006) and in stage II patients (hazard ratio, 0.34; P < or = 0.0005). Similar results were found with multivariate analysis. Met in the membrane alone was not a significant predictor of outcome in all patients or within stage. In the 3,3'-diaminobenzidine-stained array, no associations were found with Met expression and survival.
CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the relative subcellular distribution of Met, as measured by novel automated image analysis, may be a valuable biomarker for estimating colon cancer prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18559601     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  25 in total

1.  Tech meets bio.

Authors:  Monica Heger
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Expression of IGF1R in normal breast tissue and subsequent risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Rulla M Tamimi; Graham A Colditz; Yihong Wang; Laura C Collins; Rong Hu; Bernard Rosner; Hanna Y Irie; James L Connolly; Stuart J Schnitt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  A Raman-based endoscopic strategy for multiplexed molecular imaging.

Authors:  Cristina L Zavaleta; Ellis Garai; Jonathan T C Liu; Steven Sensarn; Michael J Mandella; Dominique Van de Sompel; Shai Friedland; Jacques Van Dam; Christopher H Contag; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  High c-Met expression is a negative prognostic marker for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  HeLi Gao; Mei Guan; Zhao Sun; ChunMei Bai
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-01-31

Review 5.  Prognostic value of c-Met in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Xiao-Feng Yu; Jian Zou; Zi-Hua Luo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Histopathological image analysis: a review.

Authors:  Metin N Gurcan; Laura E Boucheron; Ali Can; Anant Madabhushi; Nasir M Rajpoot; B Yener
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-10-30

7.  A Clinical Wide-Field Fluorescence Endoscopic Device for Molecular Imaging Demonstrating Cathepsin Protease Activity in Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Steven Sensarn; Cristina L Zavaleta; Ehud Segal; Stephan Rogalla; Wansik Lee; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Matthew Bogyo; Christopher H Contag
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Taxonomy of breast cancer based on normal cell phenotype predicts outcome.

Authors:  Sandro Santagata; Ankita Thakkar; Ayse Ergonul; Bin Wang; Terri Woo; Rong Hu; J Chuck Harrell; George McNamara; Matthew Schwede; Aedin C Culhane; David Kindelberger; Scott Rodig; Andrea Richardson; Stuart J Schnitt; Rulla M Tamimi; Tan A Ince
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in colon cancer.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Gregory J Kirkner; Katsuhiko Nosho; Natsumi Irahara; Shoko Kure; Kaori Shima; Aditi Hazra; Andrew T Chan; Reiko Dehari; Edward L Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Lymphocytic reaction to colorectal cancer is associated with longer survival, independent of lymph node count, microsatellite instability, and CpG island methylator phenotype.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Katsuhiko Nosho; Natsumi Irahara; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Yoshifumi Baba; Kaori Shima; Jonathan N Glickman; Cristina R Ferrone; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Noriko Tanaka; Glenn Dranoff; Edward L Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.