OBJECTIVE:Depressed mothers of children with psychiatric illness struggle with both their own psychiatric disorder and the demands of caring for ill children. When maternal depression remains untreated, mothers suffer, and psychiatric illness in their offspring is less likely to improve. This randomized, controlled trial compared the interpersonal psychotherapy for depressed mothers (IPT-MOMS), a nine-session intervention based on standard interpersonal psychotherapy, to treatment as usual for depressed mothers with psychiatrically ill offspring. METHOD:Forty-seven mothers meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depression were recruited from a pediatric mental health clinic where their school-age children were receiving psychiatric treatment and randomly assigned to IPT-MOMS (N=26) or treatment as usual (N=21). Mother-child pairs were assessed at three time points: baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up. Child treatment was not determined by the study. RESULTS: Compared to subjects assigned to treatment as usual, subjects assigned to IPT-MOMS showed significantly lower levels of depression symptoms, as measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and higher levels of functioning, as measured by the Global Assessment of Functioning, at 3-month and 9-month follow-ups. Compared to the offspring of mothers receiving treatment as usual, the offspring of mothers assigned to IPT-MOMS showed significantly lower levels of depression as measured by the Children's Depressive Inventory at the 9-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Assignment to IPT-MOMS was associated with reduced levels of maternal symptoms and improved functioning at the 3- and 9-month follow-ups compared to treatment as usual. Maternal improvement preceded improvement in offspring, suggesting that maternal changes may mediate child outcomes.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE:Depressed mothers of children with psychiatric illness struggle with both their own psychiatric disorder and the demands of caring for ill children. When maternal depression remains untreated, mothers suffer, and psychiatric illness in their offspring is less likely to improve. This randomized, controlled trial compared the interpersonal psychotherapy for depressed mothers (IPT-MOMS), a nine-session intervention based on standard interpersonal psychotherapy, to treatment as usual for depressed mothers with psychiatrically ill offspring. METHOD: Forty-seven mothers meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depression were recruited from a pediatric mental health clinic where their school-age children were receiving psychiatric treatment and randomly assigned to IPT-MOMS (N=26) or treatment as usual (N=21). Mother-child pairs were assessed at three time points: baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 9-month follow-up. Child treatment was not determined by the study. RESULTS: Compared to subjects assigned to treatment as usual, subjects assigned to IPT-MOMS showed significantly lower levels of depression symptoms, as measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and higher levels of functioning, as measured by the Global Assessment of Functioning, at 3-month and 9-month follow-ups. Compared to the offspring of mothers receiving treatment as usual, the offspring of mothers assigned to IPT-MOMS showed significantly lower levels of depression as measured by the Children's Depressive Inventory at the 9-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Assignment to IPT-MOMS was associated with reduced levels of maternal symptoms and improved functioning at the 3- and 9-month follow-ups compared to treatment as usual. Maternal improvement preceded improvement in offspring, suggesting that maternal changes may mediate child outcomes.
Authors: M M Weissman; R C Bland; G J Canino; C Faravelli; S Greenwald; H G Hwu; P R Joyce; E G Karam; C K Lee; J Lellouch; J P Lépine; S C Newman; M Rubio-Stipec; J E Wells; P J Wickramaratne; H Wittchen; E K Yeh Journal: JAMA Date: 1996 Jul 24-31 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Elizabeth J Susman; Penelope K Trickett; Ronald J Iannotti; Barbara E Hollenbeck; Carolyn Zahn-Waxler Journal: Am J Orthopsychiatry Date: 1985-04
Authors: D A Brent; D J Kolko; B Birmaher; M Baugher; J Bridge; C Roth; D Holder Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Hilary B Vidair; Jazmin A Reyes; Sa Shen; Maria A Parrilla-Escobar; Charlotte M Heleniak; Ilene L Hollin; Scott Woodruff; J Blake Turner; Moira A Rynn Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2011-04-05 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: David A Brent; Steven M Brunwasser; Steven D Hollon; V Robin Weersing; Gregory N Clarke; John F Dickerson; William R Beardslee; Tracy R G Gladstone; Giovanna Porta; Frances L Lynch; Satish Iyengar; Judy Garber Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: William R Beardslee; David A Brent; V Robin Weersing; Gregory N Clarke; Giovanna Porta; Steven D Hollon; Tracy R G Gladstone; Robert Gallop; Frances L Lynch; Satish Iyengar; Lynn DeBar; Judy Garber Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Mary Acri; Samantha Frank; S Serene Olin; Geraldine Burton; Jennifer L Ball; James Weaver; Kimberly E Hoagwood Journal: J Child Fam Stud Date: 2015-02
Authors: Nancy K Grote; Susan J Spieker; Mary Jane Lohr; Sharon L Geibel; Holly A Swartz; Ellen Frank; Patricia R Houck; Wayne Katon Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Su-Chin Serene Olin; Bonnie Kerker; Ruth E K Stein; Dara Weiss; Emma D Whitmyre; Kimberly Hoagwood; Sarah M Horwitz Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 2.681