Literature DB >> 18558421

Potential of different species for use in removal of DDT from the contaminated soils.

Ce-Hui Mo1, Quan-Ying Cai, Hai-Qin Li, Qiao-Yun Zeng, Shi-Rong Tang, Yue-Chun Zhao.   

Abstract

Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and its main metabolites, p,p'-DDD and p,p'-DDE (DDTs in this study included DDT, DDD and DDE), are frequently detected in agricultural soils even though its usage in agriculture was banned in 1980s or earlier. In this study, eleven plants including eight maize (Zea mays) cultivars and three forage species (alfalfa, ryegrass and teosinte) widely cultivated in China were grown in the soils spiked with DDTs to investigate their potential for removal of DDT from the contaminated soils. The plants varied largely in their ability to accumulate and translocate DDTs, with the bioconcentration factor (BCF; DDT concentration ratio of the plant tissues to the soils) ranging from 0.014 to 0.25 and the translocation factor (TF; DDT concentration ratio of the shoots to the roots) varying from 0.35 (Zea mays cv Chaotian-23) to 0.76 (Zea mays spp. mexicana). The amount of DDT phytoextraction ranged from 3.89mug (ryegrass) to 27.0mug (teosinte) and accounted for <0.1% of the total initial DDTs spiked in the soils. After 70d, the removal rates reached 47.1-70.3% of the total initial DDTs spiked in the soils with plants while that was only 15.4% in the soils without plant. Moreover, the higher removal rates of DDTs occurred at the first 20d of experiment, and then the removal rate decreased with time. The highest amount of DDTs phytoextracted was observed in teosinte, followed by Zea mays spp. mexicana, but the highest removal rate of DDTs was found in maize (Zea mays cv Jinhai-6). Even though phytoextraction is not the main removal process for DDTs, the plant species especially Zea mays cv Jinhai-6 showed high potential for removing DDTs from the contaminated soils.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18558421     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.04.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  6 in total

1.  Cysteine-β-cyclodextrin enhanced phytoremediation of soil co-contaminated with phenanthrene and lead.

Authors:  Guanghui Wang; Yin Wang; Suhang Hu; Nansheng Deng; Feng Wu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Plant-bacteria partnerships for the remediation of persistent organic pollutants.

Authors:  Muhammad Arslan; Asma Imran; Qaiser Mahmood Khan; Muhammad Afzal
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Simultaneous effect of dissolved organic carbon, surfactant, and organic acid on the desorption of pesticides investigated by response surface methodology.

Authors:  Ha Thu Trinh; Hanh Thi Duong; Thao Thi Ta; Hoang Van Cao; Bjarne W Strobel; Giang Truong Le
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-02       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Occurrence and risk assessment of tetracycline antibiotics in soil from organic vegetable farms in a subtropical city, south China.

Authors:  Lei Xiang; Xiao-Lian Wu; Yuan-Neng Jiang; Qing-Yun Yan; Yan-Wen Li; Xian-Pei Huang; Quan-Ying Cai; Ce-Hui Mo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Evaluation of Ricinus communis L. for the Phytoremediation of Polluted Soil with Organochlorine Pesticides.

Authors:  Sandra Regina Rissato; Mário Sergio Galhiane; João Roberto Fernandes; Marli Gerenutti; Homero Marques Gomes; Renata Ribeiro; Marcos Vinícius de Almeida
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Monitoring of DDT in Agricultural Soils under Organic Farming in Poland and the Risk of Crop Contamination.

Authors:  Eligio Malusá; Małgorzata Tartanus; Witold Danelski; Artur Miszczak; Ewelina Szustakowska; Joanna Kicińska; Ewa M Furmanczyk
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.266

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.