Literature DB >> 18558017

Cost-effectiveness of macrogol 4000 compared to lactulose in the treatment of chronic functional constipation in the UK.

Julian F Guest1, John P Clegg, Marianne T Helter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of macrogol 4000 compared to lactulose in the treatment of chronic functional constipation, from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK.
METHODS: A decision model depicting the management of chronic functional constipation was constructed using clinical outcomes and resource use values derived from patients suffering from chronic functional constipation in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) Database. The model was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of a general practitioner (GP) prescribing macrogol 4000 relative to lactulose to treat adults >/=18 years of age suffering from chronic functional constipation.
RESULTS: Forty-two per cent (95% confidence interval [CI]: 38%; 46%) of macrogol 4000-treated patients are expected to be successfully treated within 3 months after starting treatment, compared to 31% (95% CI: 27%; 37%) of lactulose-treated patients. Patients' health status at 3 months was estimated to be 0.213 (95% CI: 0.200; 0.223) and 0.210 (95% CI: 0.197; 0.220) quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in the macrogol 4000 and lactulose groups, respectively. The total 3-monthly NHS cost of treating patients with macrogol 4000 or lactulose was estimated to be pound115 (95% CI: pound98; pound132) and pound102 (95% CI: pound86; pound119), respectively. Hence, the cost per QALY gained with macrogol 4000 was estimated to be pound4333.
CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the model, treatment with macrogol 4000 relative to lactulose is expected to increase the probability of being successfully treated by 35% at 3 months (p<0.0001), although this yields only a 1% improvement in health gain. Nevertheless, macrogol 4000 affords a cost-effective addition to the range of laxatives available for this potentially resource-intensive condition, since it is clinically more effective than lactulose and the cost-effective strategy from the perspective of the NHS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18558017     DOI: 10.1185/03007990802102349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  7 in total

Review 1.  Chronic constipation: current treatment options.

Authors:  Louis Wing Cheong Liu
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  Cost Effectiveness of Treatments for Chronic Constipation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dolly Han; Nicolas Iragorri; Fiona Clement; Diane Lorenzetti; Eldon Spackman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Quality of life and healthcare resource in patients receiving opioids for chronic pain: a review of the place of oxycodone/naloxone.

Authors:  Bart Morlion; Katri Elina Clemens; Will Dunlop
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Opioid-Induced Constipation and Bowel Dysfunction: A Clinical Guideline.

Authors:  Stefan Müller-Lissner; Gabrio Bassotti; Benoit Coffin; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Harald Breivik; Elon Eisenberg; Anton Emmanuel; Françoise Laroche; Winfried Meissner; Bart Morlion
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  Macrogol (polyethylene glycol) 4000 without electrolytes in the symptomatic treatment of chronic constipation: a profile of its use.

Authors:  Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson
Journal:  Drugs Ther Perspect       Date:  2018-06-15

6.  The Cost Effectiveness of Lubiprostone in Chronic Idiopathic Constipation.

Authors:  Becky Pennington; Emily-Ruth Marriott; Peter Lichtlen; Ayesha Akbar; Anthony J Hatswell
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2018-09

7.  Measuring quality of life in opioid-induced constipation: mapping EQ-5D-3 L and PAC-QOL.

Authors:  Anthony James Hatswell; Stefan Vegter
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2016-04-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.