Literature DB >> 18557680

Confidence intervals for standardized linear contrasts of means.

Douglas G Bonett1.   

Abstract

Most psychology journals now require authors to report a sample value of effect size along with hypothesis testing results. The sample effect size value can be misleading because it contains sampling error. Authors often incorrectly interpret the sample effect size as if it were the population effect size. A simple solution to this problem is to report a confidence interval for the population value of the effect size. Standardized linear contrasts of means are useful measures of effect size in a wide variety of research applications. New confidence intervals for standardized linear contrasts of means are developed and may be applied to between-subjects designs, within-subjects designs, or mixed designs. The proposed confidence interval methods are easy to compute, do not require equal population variances, and perform better than the currently available methods when the population variances are not equal. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18557680     DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.13.2.99

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  8 in total

1.  Association of Intrauterine Growth Restriction and Small for Gestational Age Status With Childhood Cognitive Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chiara Sacchi; Claudia Marino; Chiara Nosarti; Alessio Vieno; Silvia Visentin; Alessandra Simonelli
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 16.193

2.  Female Sprague-Dawley rats display greater appetitive and consummatory responses to alcohol.

Authors:  Steven J Nieto; Therese A Kosten
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The specificity of parenting effects: Differential relations of parent praise and criticism to children's theories of intelligence and learning goals.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Gunderson; M Brent Donnellan; Richard W Robins; Kali H Trzesniewski
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2018-04-24

4.  Effect sizes of the differences between means without assuming variance equality and between a mean and a constant.

Authors:  Satoshi Aoki
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-01-27

5.  Normal recognition of famous voices in developmental prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Maria Tsantani; Richard Cook
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Low statistical power and overestimated anthropogenic impacts, exacerbated by publication bias, dominate field studies in global change biology.

Authors:  Yefeng Yang; Helmut Hillebrand; Malgorzata Lagisz; Ian Cleasby; Shinichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 13.211

Review 7.  Neurocognitive Changes in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: A Systematic Review with a Narrative Design.

Authors:  Kah Hui Yap; Roy P C Kessels; Shahrul Azmin; Bart van de Warrenburg; Norlinah Mohamed Ibrahim
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.648

8.  Species sensitivities to a global pollutant: A meta-analysis on acoustic signals in response to anthropogenic noise.

Authors:  Hansjoerg P Kunc; Rouven Schmidt
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 13.211

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.