Literature DB >> 18557010

Psychometric testing of SPIDER: data capture tool for systematic literature reviews.

Sherrilene Classen1, Sandra Winter, Kezia D Awadzi, Cynthia W Garvan, Ellen D S Lopez, Swathy Sundaram.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Systematic literature reviews contribute to evidence-based occupational therapy, yet no data capture tool currently exists to validly and reliably appraise the characteristics and quality of primary studies.
METHOD: We determined the psychometrics of Systematic Process for Investigating and Describing Evidence-Based Research (SPIDER) and piloted it with 201 studies included in a systematic literature review.
RESULTS: Content validity showed item relevance with 73% agreement between two experts. For the quality construct, seven of nine quality indicators were positively (p < .05) correlated with the overall quality score. The quality scores were positively correlated (p < .05) with two objective measures, inferring criterion validity. Intrarater reliability was moderate to perfect (kappa = 0.4-1.0). Cross-tab analyses showed less variation in experienced reviewers' interrater reliability.
CONCLUSION: SPIDER provides plausible opportunities for occupational therapy researchers and graduate students to appraise the characteristics and quality of primary studies but requires testing across other settings.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18557010     DOI: 10.5014/ajot.62.3.335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Occup Ther        ISSN: 0272-9490


  1 in total

1.  The Development of a Checklist to Enhance Methodological Quality in Intervention Programs.

Authors:  Salvador Chacón-Moscoso; Susana Sanduvete-Chaves; Milagrosa Sánchez-Martín
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.