BACKGROUND: The recent interest of clinical laboratories in developing serum testosterone assays based on isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS) stems from the lack of accuracy of direct immunoassays. In this study, we assessed the accuracy and state of standardization (traceability) of 4 published ID-LC-MS/MS procedures in a method comparison with an ID-gas chromatography (GC)-MS reference measurement procedure listed in the database of the Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine. METHODS: The study used 58 specimens from different patient categories. Each specimen was measured in triplicate (ID-LC-MS/MS) and quadruplicate (ID-GC-MS) in independent runs. RESULTS: The testosterone concentrations by ID-GC-MS were 0.2-4.4 nmol/L (women), 0.2-2.0 nmol/L (hypogonadal man), and 10.1-31.3 nmol/L (normogonadal men). For ID-GC-MS, the CV was nearly constant, with a median of 1.0%; for ID-LC-MS/MS, it was concentration-dependent, with a median of up to 8%. Weighted Deming regression gave mean slopes, intercepts, and correlation coefficients of 0.90-1.11, -0.055-0.013 nmol/L, and 0.993-0.997, respectively. The % difference plot showed between 7% and 26% of the results outside a total error limit of 14%, with median deviations from ID-GC-MS between -9.6 and 0.4%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated fairly good accuracy and standardization of the tested ID-LC-MS/MS procedures. Performance differences between procedures were evident in some instances, due to improper calibration and between-run calibration control. This emphasizes the need for thorough validation, including traceability, of new ID-LC-MS/MS procedures.
BACKGROUND: The recent interest of clinical laboratories in developing serum testosterone assays based on isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS) stems from the lack of accuracy of direct immunoassays. In this study, we assessed the accuracy and state of standardization (traceability) of 4 published ID-LC-MS/MS procedures in a method comparison with an ID-gas chromatography (GC)-MS reference measurement procedure listed in the database of the Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine. METHODS: The study used 58 specimens from different patient categories. Each specimen was measured in triplicate (ID-LC-MS/MS) and quadruplicate (ID-GC-MS) in independent runs. RESULTS: The testosterone concentrations by ID-GC-MS were 0.2-4.4 nmol/L (women), 0.2-2.0 nmol/L (hypogonadal man), and 10.1-31.3 nmol/L (normogonadal men). For ID-GC-MS, the CV was nearly constant, with a median of 1.0%; for ID-LC-MS/MS, it was concentration-dependent, with a median of up to 8%. Weighted Deming regression gave mean slopes, intercepts, and correlation coefficients of 0.90-1.11, -0.055-0.013 nmol/L, and 0.993-0.997, respectively. The % difference plot showed between 7% and 26% of the results outside a total error limit of 14%, with median deviations from ID-GC-MS between -9.6 and 0.4%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated fairly good accuracy and standardization of the tested ID-LC-MS/MS procedures. Performance differences between procedures were evident in some instances, due to improper calibration and between-run calibration control. This emphasizes the need for thorough validation, including traceability, of new ID-LC-MS/MS procedures.
Authors: Richard S Legro; William D Schlaff; Michael P Diamond; Christos Coutifaris; Peter R Casson; Robert G Brzyski; Gregory M Christman; J C Trussell; Stephen A Krawetz; Peter J Snyder; Dana Ohl; Sandra A Carson; Michael P Steinkampf; Bruce R Carr; Peter G McGovern; Nicholas A Cataldo; Gabriella G Gosman; John E Nestler; Evan R Myers; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Meizhuo Zhang; Heping Zhang Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-09-08 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: William Rosner; Susan E Hankinson; Patrick M Sluss; Hubert W Vesper; Margaret E Wierman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: J P Dias; D Melvin; E M Simonsick; O Carlson; M D Shardell; L Ferrucci; C W Chia; S Basaria; J M Egan Journal: Andrology Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 3.842