H J Smith1, J B Richardson, A Tennant. 1. Arthritis Research Centre, RJAH Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Gobowen, Oswestry, Shropshire, UK. heatherj.smith@rjah.nhs.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Lysholm Knee Scale is an 8-item questionnaire originally designed as an outcome measure for ligament reconstruction but is commonly used as a measure for knee chondral damage. This study tests the scale's internal construct validity using the Rasch model, a measurement model which sets strict standards for the quality of measurement derived from the scale. The study also investigates the level of agreement between scores from patients and physiotherapists; and reviews the present weighting system. DESIGN:One hundred and fifty-seven patients with knee chondral damage awaiting surgery completed the Lysholm as part of a multicentre clinical trial based in 16 UK and two Norwegian hospitals. The patients were assessed by a physiotherapist who independently completed the Lysholm on the same day. RESULTS: Fit to the Rasch model was achieved [mean item fit -0.26, standard deviation (SD) 1.01] after removal of one item (Swelling). With no differential item functioning (DIF) by rater, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-0.93] and a Bland-Altman plot showed no consistent difference in rating. CONCLUSIONS: The Lysholm Knee Scale satisfies Rasch model expectations after removal of the swelling item. Generally there is a high degree of agreement between the patient and professional ratings. By removing the swelling item and using unweighted scores, a modified version of the Lysholm Knee Scale is recommended as an outcome measure for knee chondral damage.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The Lysholm Knee Scale is an 8-item questionnaire originally designed as an outcome measure for ligament reconstruction but is commonly used as a measure for knee chondral damage. This study tests the scale's internal construct validity using the Rasch model, a measurement model which sets strict standards for the quality of measurement derived from the scale. The study also investigates the level of agreement between scores from patients and physiotherapists; and reviews the present weighting system. DESIGN: One hundred and fifty-seven patients with knee chondral damage awaiting surgery completed the Lysholm as part of a multicentre clinical trial based in 16 UK and two Norwegian hospitals. The patients were assessed by a physiotherapist who independently completed the Lysholm on the same day. RESULTS: Fit to the Rasch model was achieved [mean item fit -0.26, standard deviation (SD) 1.01] after removal of one item (Swelling). With no differential item functioning (DIF) by rater, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-0.93] and a Bland-Altman plot showed no consistent difference in rating. CONCLUSIONS: The Lysholm Knee Scale satisfies Rasch model expectations after removal of the swelling item. Generally there is a high degree of agreement between the patient and professional ratings. By removing the swelling item and using unweighted scores, a modified version of the Lysholm Knee Scale is recommended as an outcome measure for knee chondral damage.
Authors: Natalie J Collins; Devyani Misra; David T Felson; Kay M Crossley; Ewa M Roos Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Tommy S de Windt; Sebastian Concaro; Anders Lindahl; Daniel B F Saris; Mats Brittberg Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2012-01-14 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jennifer S Howard; Christian Lattermann; Johanna M Hoch; Carl G Mattacola; Jennifer M Medina McKeon Journal: Cartilage Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Johan Stenberg; Tommy S de Windt; Jane Synnergren; Lars Hynsjö; Josefine van der Lee; Daniel B F Saris; Mats Brittberg; Lars Peterson; Anders Lindahl Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2014-09-24