Literature DB >> 18556159

The psychoacoustics of noise vocoded speech: a physiological means to a perceptual end.

Jeremy L Loebach1, Robert E Wickesberg.   

Abstract

Noise vocoded speech tokens produce temporal patterns in the ensemble response of the auditory nerve similar to those of their naturally produced counterparts [Loebach, J.L., Wickesberg, R.E., 2006. The representation of noise vocoded speech in the auditory nerve of the chinchilla: Physiological correlates for the perception of spectrally reduced speech. Hear. Res. 213 (1-2), 130-144]. Moreover, the degree of pattern similarity increased as more noise bands were used to synthesize the vocoded stimuli, suggesting a relationship between the patterns that these stimuli evoke in the auditory nerve and their recognition by human subjects. In order to make a direct comparison between the psychoacoustic and physiological domains, the present study obtained the perceptual identification scores for these stimuli. A set of 120 stimuli containing the 16 tokens of interest was presented to 30 young normal hearing subjects, who identified the tokens in a closed set task. Overall, the perceptual identification of the tokens increased in accuracy with the addition of noise bands. The neural pattern similarity was quantified using dynamic time warping, and correlated with the perceptual identification scores for the target stimuli of interest. A significant linear relationship between the pattern similarity and perceptual identification scores was found, such that as neural pattern similarity increased, the accuracy of stimulus identification also increased. These findings suggest a possible physiological substrate for the recognition of noise vocoded consonants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18556159     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  2 in total

Review 1.  Why do I hear but not understand? Stochastic undersampling as a model of degraded neural encoding of speech.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Does training with amplitude modulated tones affect tone-vocoded speech perception?

Authors:  Aina Casaponsa; Ediz Sohoglu; David R Moore; Christian Füllgrabe; Katharine Molloy; Sygal Amitay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.