Literature DB >> 18555108

Factors associated with discard of recovered kidneys.

Y W Cho1, T Shah, E S Cho, M Stadtler, V Simmons, T Mone, R Mendez, I V Hutchinson, J Gill, S Bunnapradist.   

Abstract

We reviewed diseased donor (DD) kidney usage at a single Organ Procurement Organization in Southern California to more closely examine factors associated with discard. From 2001 to 2006, 3863 kidneys from 1959 DDs were recovered, but 454 (11.8%) were subsequently discarded. Among the discarded kidneys, 211 (46.5%) were discarded based upon biopsy findings, 19 (4.2%) due to anatomical abnormalities, 16 (3.5%) based on donor quality, and 14 (3.1%) because they were felt to be too old to be pumped. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using significant prognostic factors upon univariate analyses. According to the magnitude of the adjusted odds ratio (AOR), significant prognostic factors for discard were extreme donor age (AOR = 24.1 of age 70-80 years, P < .001; AOR = 6.34 age 50-69 years, P < .001; AOR = 2.77 age 40-49 years, P < .001; and AOR = 3.09 age <10 years, P < .001 vs age 10-39 years), high final resistance (AOR = 8.86 of >40 vs others, P = .006), glomerulosclerosis (GS) > 20% (AOR = 5.94 vs GS 0%-5%/no biopsy, P < .001), severe atherosclerosis (AOR = 4.66, P = .003), abnormal anatomy (AOR = 2.7, P < .001), and moderate or severe arteriolosclerosis (AOR = 2.2 vs none/mild/no biopsy, P < .001). Among biopsy findings, the presence of GS > 20% was associated with the highest likelihood of discard. A high final resistance increased the likelihood of discard as well. In conclusion, these findings may help to set the groundwork toward a more uniform approach to organ utilization in donor service areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18555108     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  5 in total

1.  Factors leading to the discard of deceased donor kidneys in the United States.

Authors:  Sumit Mohan; Mariana C Chiles; Rachel E Patzer; Stephen O Pastan; S Ali Husain; Dustin J Carpenter; Geoffrey K Dube; R John Crew; Lloyd E Ratner; David J Cohen
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Racial and socioeconomic disparities in the allocation of expanded criteria donor kidneys.

Authors:  Rajesh Mohandas; Michael J Casey; Robert L Cook; Kenneth E Lamb; Xuerong Wen; Mark S Segal
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Hepatocyte viability and adenosine triphosphate content decrease linearly over time during conventional cold storage of rat liver grafts.

Authors:  T A Berendsen; M L Izamis; H Xu; Q Liu; M Hertl; F Berthiaume; M L Yarmush; K Uygun
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Reliability of deceased-donor procurement kidney biopsy images uploaded in United Network for Organ Sharing.

Authors:  Sherry G Mansour; Isaac E Hall; Peter P Reese; Yaqi Jia; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook; Gilbert Moeckel; Francis L Weng; Monica P Revelo; Mazdak A Khalighi; Anshu Trivedi; Mona D Doshi; Bernd Schröppel; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 2.863

5.  Feasibility of renal transplantation after unroofing of a large renal cyst in an expanded criteria donor.

Authors:  Prashanth Kanagarajah; Obi Ekwenna; Rajinikanth Ayyathurai; George W Burk; Gaetano Ciancio
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2013-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.