Literature DB >> 18554650

Urinary and sexual quality of life 1 year following robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Sergey A Shikanov1, Michael K Eng, Andrew J Bernstein, Mark Katz, Gregory P Zagaja, Arieh L Shalhav, Kevin C Zorn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated urinary and sexual quality of life 1 year following robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and identified preoperative variables predictive of a severe decrease from baseline.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a prospective robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy database we identified patients with greater than 1 year of postoperative followup. The UCLA-PCI SF-36v2 questionnaire was used to evaluate urinary and sexual quality of life before and 1 year after surgery. Severe worsening of the postoperative score was defined as a greater than 1 SD decrease. Demographic and preoperative clinical variables were evaluated along with baseline scores on univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Between February 2003 and September 2007 a total of 1,225 robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomies were performed at our center and 361 patients (52%) met inclusion criteria. On multivariate analysis baseline urinary function was the only predictor of significant worsening of urinary function (OR 1.04, p = 0.003). Baseline urinary bother was the only predictor of significant worsening of urinary bother (OR 1.05, p <0.0001). A significant decrease in sexual function was predicted by baseline sexual function (OR 1.03, p = 0.0001), baseline sexual bother (OR 1.03, p = 0.005) and nerve sparing technique (OR 0.31, p = 0.05). Predictors of a significant decrease in sexual bother were also baseline sexual function (OR 1.02, p = 0.0001), baseline sexual bother (OR 1.04, p = 0.0007) and nerve sparing technique (OR 0.38, p = 0.02). ORs indicated that higher baseline scores corresponded to a higher risk of postoperative score worsening.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that overall better baseline sexual and urinary scores are associated with better postoperative outcomes. However, the risk of a significant decrease in urinary function, urinary bother, sexual function and sexual bother is higher in patients with better baseline scores. Nerve sparing positively affects sexual function and sexual bother.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18554650     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

Review 1.  The current status of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Prokar Dasgupta; Roger S Kirby
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Prospective comparison of the impact of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy on health-related quality of life and decision regret.

Authors:  B Joyce Davison; Andrew Matthew; Abbie M Gardner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Impact of obesity on early erectile function recovery after robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ekong E Uffort; James C Jensen
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Nerve Bundle Hydrodissection and Sexual Function after Robot Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hannah Wenger; Aria Razmaria; Scott Eggener; Jay D Raman
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.