Literature DB >> 18554602

Flow rate gradient high-speed counter-current chromatography separation of five diterpenoids from Triperygium wilfordii and scale-up.

Aihua Peng1, Rui Li, Jia Hu, Lijuan Chen, Xia Zhao, Houding Luo, Haoyu Ye, Yuan Yuan, Yuquan Wei.   

Abstract

In this paper, high-speed counter-current chromatography (HSCCC) instruments with different gravitational forces were applied for the separation of bioactive compounds from Triperygium wilfordii Hook.f. The critical parameters including sample concentration, sample volume and flow rate were first optimized on an analytical Mini-DE HSCCC system, and then scaled up to a preparative TBE 300A HSCCC system. Although this scale-up process was performed using different CCC instruments with different centrifuges and gravitational forces, the same resolutions were obtained and the elution time could be predictable. Five diterpenoid compounds and one unknown compound were separated from Triperygium wilfordii Hook.f. by HSCCC with a two-phase solvent system composed of n-hexane-ethyl acetate-methanol-water (HEMW) (3:2:3:2, v/v/v/v). This one-step flow gradient separation produced triptonide (25 mg), isoneotriptophenolide (77 mg), hypolide (83 mg), unknown compound (1 mg), triptophenolide (42 mg), triptonoterpene methyl ether VI (37 mg) from 320 mg crude extract with purities of 98.2%, 96.6%, 98.1%, 95.3%, 95.1%, and 96.5%, respectively. Their purities and structures were identified by high-performance liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry and NMR. This paper demonstrates that analytical CCC plays an important role in optimizing parameters and scale-up process when analytical CCC and preparative CCC are supplied by different manufacturers with different gravitational forces, and the scale-up process from analytical CCC to preparative CCC is still predictable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18554602     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.05.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  6 in total

Review 1.  Countercurrent Separation of Natural Products: An Update.

Authors:  J Brent Friesen; James B McAlpine; Shao-Nong Chen; Guido F Pauli
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.050

Review 2.  Solvent System Selection Strategies in Countercurrent Separation.

Authors:  Yang Liu; J Brent Friesen; James B McAlpine; Guido F Pauli
Journal:  Planta Med       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Real-Time Volumetric Phase Monitoring: Advancing Chemical Analysis by Countercurrent Separation.

Authors:  Guido F Pauli; Samuel M Pro; Lucas R Chadwick; Thomas Burdick; Luke Pro; Warren Friedl; Nick Novak; John Maltby; Feng Qiu; J Brent Friesen
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Preparative isolation and purification of four compounds from Cistanches deserticola Y.C. Ma by high-speed counter-current chromatography.

Authors:  Lifeng Han; Lina Ji; Mavis Boakye-Yiadom; Wei Li; Xinbo Song; Xiumei Gao
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Triptonide effectively inhibits triple-negative breast cancer metastasis through concurrent degradation of Twist1 and Notch1 oncoproteins.

Authors:  Mengli Zhang; Mei Meng; Yuxi Liu; Jindan Qi; Zhe Zhao; Yingnan Qiao; Yanxing Hu; Wei Lu; Zhou Zhou; Peng Xu; Quansheng Zhou
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 6.  Counter-current chromatography for the separation of terpenoids: a comprehensive review with respect to the solvent systems employed.

Authors:  Krystyna Skalicka-Woźniak; Ian Garrard
Journal:  Phytochem Rev       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 5.374

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.