Literature DB >> 18554192

Severe atrioventricular decoupling, uncoupling, and ventriculoatrial coupling during enhanced atrial pacing: incidence, mechanisms, and implications for minimizing right ventricular pacing in ICD patients.

Michael O Sweeney1, Kenneth A Ellenbogen, Anthony S L Tang, James Johnson, Paul Belk, Todd Sheldon.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: AV Decoupling During Enhanced AAIR Pacing.
BACKGROUND: Enhanced AAI/R pacing minimizes right ventricular pacing but may permit or induce AV decoupling (AV-DC) due to unrestricted AV intervals (AVIs). The purpose of this study was to characterize and quantify AVI behavior in a randomized trial of enhanced AAI/R pacing in ICD patients.
METHODS: One hundred twenty-one patients in the Marquis ICD MVPtrade mark Study, a randomized 1-month crossover comparison of cumulative% ventricular pacing (Cum%VP) in enhanced AAIR (MVP) vs DDD/R, were analyzed. AV-DC was defined as >or=40% AVIs >300 ms; VA coupling (VA-C) was defined as%V-atrial pace (AP) intervals <300 ms. Dynamic AVI behavior and increases in Cum%VP due to AV block (AV uncoupling, AV-UC) were characterized using Holters with real-time ICD telemetry.
RESULTS: AV-DC occurred in 17 (14%) of patients. Baseline PR, amiodarone, nighttime, lower rate >60 beats/min, rate response, and Cum%AP were associated with longer AVIs. Logistic regression identified baseline PR (odds ratio [OR]= 1.024, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.007-1.042; P = 0.005), and Cum%AP (OR = 1.089, 95% CI 1.027-1.154; P = 0.004) as predictors of AV-DC. AV-DC was associated with approximately 10-fold increases in both Cum%VP (13.6 +/- 28.3% vs 1.2 +/- 3.9%; P = 0.023) due to transient AV-UC) and VA-C (6.0 +/- 17.5% vs 0.5 +/- 1.2%, P = 0.028). AV coupling (<40% AVIs >300 ms) was preserved in 104 (86%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: AV-DC, VA-C, and AV-UC may be worsened or induced by enhanced AAI/R pacing. Conservative programming of lower rate and rate response should reduce the risk of AV-DC by reducing Cum%AP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18554192     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01226.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  8 in total

Review 1.  The importance of avoiding unnecessary right ventricular pacing in clinical practice.

Authors:  Finn Akerström; Miguel A Arias; Marta Pachón; Jesús Jiménez-López; Alberto Puchol; Justo Juliá-Calvo
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-26

Review 2.  Cardiomyopathy induced by artificial cardiac pacing: myth or reality sustained by evidence?

Authors:  Andrés Di Leoni Ferrari; Anibal Pires Borges; Luciano Cabral Albuquerque; Carolina Pelzer Sussenbach; Priscila Raupp da Rosa; Ricardo Medeiros Piantá; Mario Wiehe; Marco Antônio Goldani
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

3.  2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.

Authors:  Bruce L Wilkoff; Laurent Fauchier; Martin K Stiles; Carlos A Morillo; Sana M Al-Khatib; Jesœs Almendral; Luis Aguinaga; Ronald D Berger; Alejandro Cuesta; James P Daubert; Sergio Dubner; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Guilherme Fenelon; Fermin C Garcia; Maurizio Gasparini; David E Haines; Jeff S Healey; Jodie L Hurtwitz; Roberto Keegan; Christof Kolb; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Germanas Marinskis; Martino Martinelli; Mark McGuire; Luis G Molina; Ken Okumura; Alessandro Proclemer; Andrea M Russo; Jagmeet P Singh; Charles D Swerdlow; Wee Siong Teo; William Uribe; Sami Viskin; Chun-Chieh Wang; Shu Zhang
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-02-01

4.  The Italian subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator survey: S-ICD, why not?

Authors:  Giovanni Luca Botto; Giovanni B Forleo; Alessandro Capucci; Francesco Solimene; Antonello Vado; Giovanni Bertero; Pietro Palmisano; Ennio Pisanò; Antonio Rapacciuolo; Tommaso Infusino; Alessandro Vicentini; Miguel Viscusi; Paola Ferrari; Antonello Talarico; Giovanni Russo; Giuseppe Boriani; Luigi Padeletti; Mariolina Lovecchio; Sergio Valsecchi; Antonio D'Onofrio
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Acute echocardiographic and hemodynamic response to his-bundle pacing in patients with first-degree atrioventricular block.

Authors:  Zak Loring; Fredrik Holmqvist; Edward Sze; Fawaz Alenezi; Kristen Campbell; Jason I Koontz; Eric J Velazquez; Brett D Atwater; Tristram D Bahnson; James P Daubert
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 1.485

6.  Difference in percentage of ventricular pacing between two algorithms for minimizing ventricular pacing: results of the IDEAL RVP (Identify the Best Algorithm for Reducing Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing) study.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Murakami; Naoya Tsuboi; Yasuya Inden; Yukihiko Yoshida; Toyoaki Murohara; Zenichi Ihara; Mitsuaki Takami
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Atrial antitachycardia pacing and managed ventricular pacing in bradycardia patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial tachyarrhythmias: the MINERVA randomized multicentre international trial.

Authors:  Giuseppe Boriani; Raymond Tukkie; Antonis S Manolis; Lluis Mont; Helmut Pürerfellner; Massimo Santini; Giuseppe Inama; Paolo Serra; João de Sousa; Giovanni Luca Botto; Lorenza Mangoni; Andrea Grammatico; Luigi Padeletti
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Safety and efficiency of ventricular pacing prevention with an AAI-DDD changeover mode in patients with sinus node disease or atrioventricular block: impact on battery longevity-a sub-study of the ANSWER trial.

Authors:  Martin Stockburger; Pascal Defaye; Serge Boveda; Branislav Stancak; Arnaud Lazarus; Johann Sipötz; Stefano Nardi; Mara Rolando; Javier Moreno
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.214

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.