Literature DB >> 18553213

Streamlining the evaluation of low back pain in children.

Joshua D Auerbach1, Jaimo Ahn, Miltiadis H Zgonis, Sudheer C Reddy, Malcolm L Ecker, John M Flynn.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The workup of low back pain in children often results in overimaging so as not to miss organic back pain. The primary goal of this study was to identify which combination of imaging modalities provides the most sensitive and specific screening protocol for children with low back pain. Medical records from 100 consecutive patients between 2 and 18 years of age presenting with low back pain, without night pain or constitutional symptoms, were evaluated. A hyperextension test combined with a radiograph showed a negative predictive value of 0.81 and sensitivity of 0.90. The addition of a bone scan was highly effective in achieving good negative predictive value and sensitivity. Bone scans had perfect negative predictive value and sensitivity when symptom duration was less than 6 weeks. We identified a set of factors that is highly predictive for distinguishing organic back pain from mechanical back pain. Painless hyperextension combined with negative anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar radiographs and magnetic resonance images predicts mechanical back pain. For patients with nonneurologic back pain of less than 6 weeks duration, bone scan is the most useful screening test because it is accurate, accessible, inexpensive, and unlikely to require sedation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18553213      PMCID: PMC2584263          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0296-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  27 in total

1.  The use of bone scan to investigate back pain in children and adolescents.

Authors:  D S Feldman; D M Hedden; J G Wright
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  Bone scintigraphy and radiography in young athletes with low back pain.

Authors:  N Papanicolaou; R H Wilkinson; J B Emans; S Treves; L J Micheli
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  The use of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the diagnosis of low-back pain in young patients.

Authors:  R J Bodner; S Heyman; D S Drummond; J R Gregg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Epidemiology of juvenile low back pain: a review.

Authors:  T Duggleby; S Kumar
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.033

5.  Adverse events and risk factors associated with the sedation of children by nonanesthesiologists.

Authors:  S Malviya; T Voepel-Lewis; A R Tait
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Prolonged recovery and delayed side effects of sedation for diagnostic imaging studies in children.

Authors:  S Malviya; T Voepel-Lewis; G Prochaska; A R Tait
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Chronic low back pain: comparison of bone SPECT with radiography and CT.

Authors:  P J Ryan; P A Evans; T Gibson; I Fogelman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Low-back pain in athletes.

Authors:  Christopher M Bono
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Low-back pain in adolescent athletes: detection of stress injury to the pars interarticularis with SPECT.

Authors:  R D Bellah; D A Summerville; S T Treves; L J Micheli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Back pain in childhood.

Authors:  P G Turner; J H Green; C S Galasko
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Acquired pathology of the pediatric spine and spinal cord.

Authors:  Susan Palasis; Laura L Hayes
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-09-07

Review 2.  Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Alysha J Taxter; Nancy A Chauvin; Pamela F Weiss
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 3.  [Imaging of non-traumatic spinal diseases in children].

Authors:  G Pärtan; R Eyb; G Artacker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  Imaging of back pain in children.

Authors:  D P Rodriguez; T Y Poussaint
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Back Pain in Children- How Sinister?

Authors:  Pankaj Kandwal; G Vijayaraghavan; Ankur Goswami; Arvind Jayaswal
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Plain Radiographs Among Adolescents With Back Pain and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Sohrab S Virk; Walter P Samora; Frank M Phillips; Safdar N Khan
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

7.  Low back pain in children and adolescents: an algorithmic clinical approach.

Authors:  Ramin Kordi; Mohsen Rostami
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.364

8.  Predictors of Spondylolysis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Adolescent Athletes With Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Takuji Yokoe; Takuya Tajima; Hiroshi Sugimura; Shinichirou Kubo; Shotarou Nozaki; Nami Yamaguchi; Yudai Morita; Etsuo Chosa
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.