Literature DB >> 1855302

Liquid-chromatographic determination of nicotine and cotinine in urine from passive smokers: comparison with gas chromatography with a nitrogen-specific detector.

M Hariharan1, T VanNoord.   

Abstract

We describe a simple, sensitive, and specific high-performance liquid-chromatographic method with ultraviolet detection (256 nm) for the simultaneous analysis of nicotine and cotinine in urine of passive smokers. The analytes are extracted and purified from the complex and impure matrix in two stages; first, by liquid-liquid extraction and followed by solid-phase extraction (C2 column). We used a "DB" C8 5-microns-particle column (25 x 0.46 cm) and a mobile phase of phosphate-citrate buffer and acetonitrile (91:9 by vol) containing 5 mL of triethylamine and 600 mg of heptanesulfonate per liter, adjusted to pH 4.4, to separate the compounds. Two internal standards (2-phenylimidazole and N-ethylnorcotinine) were used. The detection limit of the HPLC assay was less than 1 microgram/L for both analytes. The average interassay CV for nicotine was 7.6%, for cotinine 6.5%, in the concentration range 0-60 micrograms/L. The mean analytical recovery of nicotine with respect to the internal standard N-ethylnorcotinine was 102% and that for cotinine was 99%; the mean absolute recoveries of the compounds were as follows: nicotine 85%, cotinine 87%, and N-ethylnorcotinine 87%. To compare the HPLC assay results of 20 samples with the more-sensitive in-laboratory gas-chromatographic method with a nitrogen-phosphorus detector, we used both N-ethylnornicotine and N-ethylnorcotinine as internal standards. The mean correlation coefficient for nicotine values between the two methods was 0.934; for cotinine, 0.987.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1855302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  13 in total

1.  Smokeless tobacco use and salivary cotinine concentration.

Authors:  Amy K Ferketich; Alvin G Wee; Jennifer Shultz; Mary Ellen Wewers
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-06-09       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Factors associated with smokeless tobacco cessation in an Appalachian population.

Authors:  Ross M Kauffman; Amy K Ferketich; Alvin G Wee; Jennifer M Shultz; Patty Kuun; Mary Ellen Wewers
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  The serotonin transporter gene and startle response during nicotine deprivation.

Authors:  Jennifer A Minnix; Jason D Robinson; Cho Y Lam; Brian L Carter; Jennifer E Foreman; David J Vandenbergh; Gail E Tomlinson; David W Wetter; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Gender differences in affective response to acute nicotine administration and deprivation.

Authors:  Jason D Robinson; Paul M Cinciripini; Stephen T Tiffany; Brian L Carter; Cho Y Lam; David W Wetter
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 3.913

5.  A measure of nicotine dependence for smokeless tobacco users.

Authors:  Amy K Ferketich; Alvin G Wee; Jennifer Shultz; Mary Ellen Wewers
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Sex differences in anxiety-like behavior and locomotor activity following chronic nicotine exposure in mice.

Authors:  Barbara J Caldarone; Sarah L King; Marina R Picciotto
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Nicotine differentially inhibits the acoustic startle reflex in African American and Caucasian American smokers.

Authors:  Cho Y Lam; Jason D Robinson; Brian L Carter; David W Wetter; Jennifer A Minnix; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Simultaneous and sensitive measurement of nicotine, cotinine, trans-3'-hydroxycotinine and norcotinine in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Diaa M Shakleya; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.205

Review 9.  Assessing secondhand smoke using biological markers.

Authors:  Erika Avila-Tang; Wael K Al-Delaimy; David L Ashley; Neal Benowitz; John T Bernert; Sungroul Kim; Jonathan M Samet; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Urinary 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine as a biomarker of oxidative DNA damage in workers exposed to fine particulates.

Authors:  Jee Young Kim; Sutapa Mukherjee; Long C Ngo; David C Christiani
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.