Literature DB >> 18552294

Why go bipedal? Locomotion and morphology in Australian agamid lizards.

Christofer J Clemente1, Philip C Withers, Graham Thompson, David Lloyd.   

Abstract

Bipedal locomotion by lizards has previously been considered to provide a locomotory advantage. We examined this premise for a group of quadrupedal Australian agamid lizards, which vary in the extent to which they will become bipedal. The percentage of strides that each species ran bipedally, recorded using high speed video cameras, was positively related to body size and the proximity of the body centre of mass to the hip, and negatively related to running endurance. Speed was not higher for bipedal strides, compared with quadrupedal strides, in any of the four species, but acceleration during bipedal strides was significantly higher in three of four species. Furthermore, a distinct threshold between quadrupedal and bipedal strides, was more evident for acceleration than speed, with a threshold in acceleration above which strides became bipedal. We calculated these thresholds using probit analysis, and compared these to the predicted threshold based on the model of Aerts et al. Although there was a general agreement in order, the acceleration thresholds for lizards were often lower than that predicted by the model. We suggest that bipedalism, in Australian agamid lizards, may have evolved as a simple consequence of acceleration, and does not confer any locomotory advantage for increasing speed or endurance. However, both behavioural and threshold data suggest that some lizards actively attempt to run bipedally, implying some unknown advantage to bipedal locomotion.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18552294     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.018044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  7 in total

1.  Tail autotomy affects bipedalism but not sprint performance in a cursorial Mediterranean lizard.

Authors:  Pantelis Savvides; Maria Stavrou; Panayiotis Pafilis; Spyros Sfenthourakis
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-12-21

2.  Body and tail-assisted pitch control facilitates bipedal locomotion in Australian agamid lizards.

Authors:  Christofer J Clemente; Nicholas C Wu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  In search of the pitching momentum that enables some lizards to sustain bipedal running at constant speeds.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Lizards ran bipedally 110 million years ago.

Authors:  Hang-Jae Lee; Yuong-Nam Lee; Anthony R Fiorillo; Junchang Lü
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Leg force interference in polypedal locomotion.

Authors:  Tom Weihmann
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Secondary ossification center induces and protects growth plate structure.

Authors:  Meng Xie; Pavel Gol'din; Anna Nele Herdina; Jordi Estefa; Ekaterina V Medvedeva; Lei Li; Phillip T Newton; Svetlana Kotova; Boris Shavkuta; Aditya Saxena; Lauren T Shumate; Brian D Metscher; Karl Großschmidt; Shigeki Nishimori; Anastasia Akovantseva; Anna P Usanova; Anastasiia D Kurenkova; Anoop Kumar; Irene Linares Arregui; Paul Tafforeau; Kaj Fried; Mattias Carlström; András Simon; Christian Gasser; Henry M Kronenberg; Murat Bastepe; Kimberly L Cooper; Peter Timashev; Sophie Sanchez; Igor Adameyko; Anders Eriksson; Andrei S Chagin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  The Smooth Transition From Many-Legged to Bipedal Locomotion-Gradual Leg Force Reduction and its Impact on Total Ground Reaction Forces, Body Dynamics and Gait Transitions.

Authors:  Tom Weihmann
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.