Literature DB >> 1855186

The value of estrogen and progesterone receptor determinations in advanced breast cancer. Estrogen receptor level but not progesterone receptor level correlates with response to tamoxifen.

W R Bezwoda1, J D Esser, R Dansey, I Kessel, M Lange.   

Abstract

Four hundred fifteen patients with metastatic breast cancer with known hormone receptor status received primary treatment with tamoxifen. Measured values for the estrogen receptor (ER, i.e., with estrogen binding) followed a continuous distribution (range, 3 to 1000 fmol/mg of protein). These values correlated positively with age. The response to treatment with tamoxifen correlated with the ER level, with response rates of approximately 80% when the ER level was greater than 30.1 fmol/mg of protein. Two hundred eighteen (218 of 415, 52%) patients had progesterone receptor (PR) values greater than 10 fmol/mg. The PR positivity correlated with the ER level. Patients with PR levels greater than 10 fmol/mg of protein (124 of 226, 55%) had a significantly higher response rate than those with values less than 10 fmol/mg of protein (45 of 189, 24%). However, in a multivariate analysis including both receptor levels, age, site, and number of metastases, only the ER level was significant in predicting the response to treatment with tamoxifen. A quantitative estimation of the ER level thus is the best predictor of response to hormonal treatment with tamoxifen for advanced breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1855186     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910815)68:4<867::aid-cncr2820680432>3.0.co;2-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  10 in total

1.  Impact of low estrogen/progesterone receptor expression on survival outcomes in breast cancers previously classified as triple negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Kanwal P S Raghav; Leonel F Hernandez-Aya; Xiudong Lei; Marianan Chavez-Macgregor; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Thomas A Buchholz; Aysegul Sahin; Kim-Anh Do; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  A five-gene model predicts clinical outcome in ER+/PR+, early-stage breast cancers treated with adjuvant tamoxifen.

Authors:  Daniel Alan Kerr; James L Wittliff
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 3.  The role of estrogen receptors in breast cancer metastasis.

Authors:  S A Fuqua
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.673

4.  The effect of genital and lower urinary tract symptoms on steroid receptor expression in women with genital prolapse.

Authors:  Christine Elisabeth Skala; Ilka Brigitte Petry; Stefan Albrich; Alexander Puhl; Gert Naumann; Heinz Koelbl
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Predictive markers in primary breast cancer compared with lymph node and bloodspread metastases.

Authors:  Mohammad F El-Sibai; Cynthia Cohen; Aziza Nassar; Sandra C Bryant; Momin T Siddiqui
Journal:  Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-02-15

6.  Differential expression of prognostic biomarkers between interval and screen-detected breast cancers: does age or family history matter?

Authors:  Jan T Lowery; Tim Byers; John Kittelson; John E Hokanson; Judy Mouchawar; John Lewin; Dan Merrick; Lisa Hines; Meenakshi Singh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive tumors: being younger and getting less benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen treatment.

Authors:  Ke-da Yu; Gen-hong Di; Jiong Wu; Jin-song Lu; Kun-wei Shen; Guang-yu Liu; Zhen-zhou Shen; Zhio-ming Shao
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Mediation of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Estrogen/Progesterone Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer by Socioeconomic Position and Reproductive Factors.

Authors:  Garth H Rauscher; Richard T Campbell; Elizabeth L Wiley; Kent Hoskins; Melinda R Stolley; Richard B Warnecke
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  cDNA transfection followed by the isolation of a MCF-7 breast cell line resistant to tamoxifen in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  M Toi; A L Harris; R Bicknell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Interferon plus tamoxifen treatment for advanced breast cancer: in vivo biologic effects of two growth modulators.

Authors:  L Seymour; W R Bezwoda
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.