Literature DB >> 18551562

Unilateral versus bilateral stage I neuromodulator lead placement for the treatment of refractory voiding dysfunction.

Khanh Pham1, Michael L Guralnick, R Corey O'Connor.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine if bilateral S3 lead placement during the stage I trial period improves the "success" rate for advancing to stage II (permanent) sacral neuromodulator placement.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 124 (20 male and 104 female) patients undergoing stage I sacral neuromodulation (InterStim, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) implantation for the treatment of refractory voiding dysfunction was performed. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on unilateral versus bilateral stage I lead placement in the S3 foramina. Both groups were then evaluated and compared with regards to overall "success", defined as progression from stage I to stage II placement.
RESULTS: Fifty-five (44%) patients underwent unilateral stage I lead placement and 69 (56%) received bilateral S3 leads. Successful stage I trials were reported in 32/55 (58%) and 53/69 (76%) of unilateral and bilateral cohorts, respectively (P = 0.03). Five wound infections were reported-2 (3.6%) following unilateral and 3 (4.3%) after bilateral stage I lead placement. No other complications were encountered.
CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral stage I neuromodulation trial provides a significantly higher rate of improvement in refractory voiding symptoms to allow for the progress to stage II implantation. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18551562     DOI: 10.1002/nau.20577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  8 in total

1.  [Chronic pelvic pain syndrome: neurostimulation, neuromodulation and acupuncture].

Authors:  M Walter; U Sammer; T M Kessler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Sacral neuromodulation outcomes for the treatment of refractory idiopathic detrusor overactivity stratified by indication: Lack of anticholinergic efficacy versus intolerability.

Authors:  Tanya Davis; Iryna Makovey; Michael L Guralnick; R Corey O'Connor
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Contrasting the percutaneous nerve evaluation versus staged implantation in sacral neuromodulation.

Authors:  Chad Baxter; Ja-Hong Kim
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Outcomes of sacral neuromodulation for chronic pelvic pain: a Finnish national multicenter study.

Authors:  A Zegrea; J Kirss; T Pinta; T Rautio; P Varpe; M Kairaluoma; M Aho; C Böckelman; M Lavonius
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Sacral neuromodulation in overactive bladder: a review and current perspectives.

Authors:  Troy Sukhu; Michael J Kennelly; Raj Kurpad
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2016-10-26

Review 6.  Clinical utility of neurostimulation devices in the treatment of overactive bladder: current perspectives.

Authors:  Dick Aw Janssen; Frank Mj Martens; Liesbeth L de Wall; Hendrikje Mk van Breda; John Pfa Heesakkers
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2017-06-01

7.  Quantification of effectiveness of bilateral and unilateral neuromodulation in the rat bladder rhythmic contraction model.

Authors:  Xin Su; Angela Nickles; Dwight E Nelson
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Additive Inhibition of Reflex Bladder Activity Induced by Bilateral Pudendal Neuromodulation in Cats.

Authors:  Katherine Shapiro; Natalie Pace; Tara Morgan; Haotian Cai; Bing Shen; Jicheng Wang; James R Roppolo; William C de Groat; Changfeng Tai
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.