Literature DB >> 18551207

Intraligamentary anesthesia: benefits and limitations.

Tatsuo Endo1, Joachim Gabka, Lothar Taubenheim.   

Abstract

Intraligamentary anesthesia was described in France early in the 20th century as a novel and effective method of dental local anesthesia, but the method did not become established because of the inadequacy of dental instruments available at the time. Today, the use of a state-of-the-art armamentarium and the administration of well-proven anesthetic agents with intraligamentary anesthesia reduce the experience of typical unwanted effects, that is, sensation of elongation, pressure pain, precontact after the end of the analgesia, and reversible tissue changes. Dosing lever and dosing wheel syringes in combination with system-adapted injection needles enable the operator to feel the back-pressure and inject the anesthetic smoothly into the periodontal ligament. The results of most recent studies show that periodontal ligament injections do not generate unwanted effects when sensible instruments are used, proven anesthetics are administered, and the anesthesia method is practiced lege artis and mastered safely by the operator. This article discusses the advantages and technique of intraligamentary anesthesia and presents results from recent studies in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18551207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quintessence Int        ISSN: 0033-6572            Impact factor:   1.677


  5 in total

1.  Periodontal intraligament injection as alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block--meta-analysis of the literature from 1979 to 2012.

Authors:  N Shabazfar; M Daubländer; B Al-Nawas; P W Kämmerer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Evaluation of Efficacy of Intraligamentary Injection Technique for Extraction of Mandibular Teeth-A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Raunak Pradhan; Deepak Kulkarni; Lakshmi Shetty
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-01-01

3.  Comparison of Pain Perception Using Conventional Versus Computer-Controlled Intraligamentary Local Anesthetic Injection for Extraction of Primary Molars.

Authors:  Meenu Mittal; Radhika Chopra; Ashok Kumar; Dhirendra Srivastava
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2019

4.  Dexmedetomidine Co-Administered with Lidocaine Decreases Nociceptive Responses and Trigeminal Fos Expression without Motor Dysfunction and Hypotension in a Murine Orofacial Formalin Model.

Authors:  Ji-Hee Yeo; Dae-Hyun Roh
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-30

5.  Assessment of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system for pain control during restorative procedures: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hrishikesh Saoji; Mohan Thomas Nainan; Naveen Nanjappa; Mahesh Ravindra Khairnar; Meeta Hishikar; Vivek Jadhav
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2019
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.