OBJECTIVE: Sugar consumption affects insulin release and, in hypertension, may stimulate cardiac signaling mechanisms that accelerate left ventricular hypertrophy and the development of heart failure. We investigated the effects of high-fructose or sucrose diets on ventricular function and mortality in hypertensive Dahl salt-sensitive rats. METHODS: Rats were fed chows that were either high starch (70% starch, 10% fat by energy), high fat (20% carbohydrates, 60% fat), high fructose (61% fructose, 9% starch, 10% fat), or high sucrose (61% sucrose, 9% starch, 10% fat). Hypertension was induced by adding 6% salt to the chow (n = 8-11/group). RESULTS: After 8 weeks of treatment, systolic blood pressure and left ventricular mass were similarly increased in all rats that were fed high-salt diets. Hypertension caused a switch in mRNA myosin heavy chain isoform from alpha to beta, and this effect was greater in the high-salt sucrose and fructose groups than in starch and fat groups. The cardiac mRNA for atrial natriuretic factor was also increased in all high-salt groups compared to respective controls, with the increase being significantly greater in the hypertensive sucrose fed group. Mortality was greater in the sucrose group (44%) compared to all the other hypertensive groups (12-18%), as was cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in the high-salt sucrose group, which was due to an increase in end-systolic volume, and not increased end-diastolic volume. CONCLUSION: Diets high in sugar accelerated cardiac systolic dysfunction and mortality in hypertension compared to either a low-carbohydrate/high-fat or high-starch diet.
OBJECTIVE:Sugar consumption affects insulin release and, in hypertension, may stimulate cardiac signaling mechanisms that accelerate left ventricular hypertrophy and the development of heart failure. We investigated the effects of high-fructose or sucrose diets on ventricular function and mortality in hypertensiveDahl salt-sensitive rats. METHODS:Rats were fed chows that were either high starch (70% starch, 10% fat by energy), high fat (20% carbohydrates, 60% fat), high fructose (61% fructose, 9% starch, 10% fat), or high sucrose (61% sucrose, 9% starch, 10% fat). Hypertension was induced by adding 6% salt to the chow (n = 8-11/group). RESULTS: After 8 weeks of treatment, systolic blood pressure and left ventricular mass were similarly increased in all rats that were fed high-salt diets. Hypertension caused a switch in mRNA myosin heavy chain isoform from alpha to beta, and this effect was greater in the high-saltsucrose and fructose groups than in starch and fat groups. The cardiac mRNA for atrial natriuretic factor was also increased in all high-salt groups compared to respective controls, with the increase being significantly greater in the hypertensivesucrose fed group. Mortality was greater in the sucrose group (44%) compared to all the other hypertensive groups (12-18%), as was cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in the high-saltsucrose group, which was due to an increase in end-systolic volume, and not increased end-diastolic volume. CONCLUSION: Diets high in sugar accelerated cardiac systolic dysfunction and mortality in hypertension compared to either a low-carbohydrate/high-fat or high-starch diet.
Authors: Rakhee S Gupte; Venkataramana Vijay; Brian Marks; Robert J Levine; Hani N Sabbah; Michael S Wolin; Fabio A Recchia; Sachin A Gupte Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Naveen Sharma; Isidore C Okere; Monika K Duda; Janean Johnson; Celvie L Yuan; Margaret P Chandler; Paul Ernsberger; Brian D Hoit; William C Stanley Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: H N Sabbah; W C Stanley; V G Sharov; T Mishima; M Tanimura; C R Benedict; S Hegde; S Goldstein Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-10-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Darrell D Belke; Sandrine Betuing; Martin J Tuttle; Christophe Graveleau; Martin E Young; Mark Pham; Dongfang Zhang; Robert C Cooksey; Donald A McClain; Sheldon E Litwin; Heinrich Taegtmeyer; David Severson; C Ronald Kahn; E Dale Abel Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Peter A Hecker; Tatiana F Galvao; Karen M O'Shea; Bethany H Brown; Reney Henderson; Heather Riggle; Sachin A Gupte; William C Stanley Journal: Nutrition Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 4.008
Authors: Monika K Duda; Karen M O'Shea; Biao Lei; Brian R Barrows; Agnes M Azimzadeh; Tracy E McElfresh; Brian D Hoit; Willem J Kop; William C Stanley Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: I C Araujo; R P Andrade; F Santos; E S Soares; R Yokota; C Mostarda; P Fiorino; K De Angelis; M C Irigoyen; M Morris; V Farah Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2015-01-07 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Peter A Hecker; Rudo F Mapanga; Charlene P Kimar; Rogerio F Ribeiro; Bethany H Brown; Kelly A O'Connell; James W Cox; Kadambari C Shekar; Girma Asemu; M Faadiel Essop; William C Stanley Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Tatiana F Galvao; Bethany H Brown; Peter A Hecker; Kelly A O'Connell; Karen M O'Shea; Hani N Sabbah; Sharad Rastogi; Caroline Daneault; Christine Des Rosiers; William C Stanley Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: David J Chess; Ramzi J Khairallah; Karen M O'Shea; Wenhong Xu; William C Stanley Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2009-09-18 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Julie H Rennison; Tracy A McElfresh; Xiaoqin Chen; Vijay R Anand; Brian D Hoit; Charles L Hoppel; Margaret P Chandler Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2009-03-03 Impact factor: 5.000