Literature DB >> 18550895

Identifying patients with a cancer diagnosis using general practice medical records and Cancer Registry data.

Shane W Pascoe1, Richard D Neal, Philip L Heywood, Victoria L Allgar, Jeremy Nv Miles, Jasmina Stefoski-Mikeljevic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The medical records of patients with cancer need to accurately record diagnoses for professionals to provide quality care. Aims. (i) To develop a methodology which identifies medical records of patients with a cancer diagnosis. (ii) To describe the effectiveness of search strategies to identify all patients in primary care with a cancer diagnosis compared with a diagnosis identified by a Cancer Registry.
METHODS: The design of the study was a retrospective analysis of primary care medical records. Five general practices were recruited in the UK. The completeness and correctness of searches were measured and compared both within the practices and compared with a diagnosis identified by a Cancer Registry.
RESULTS: One in five of all primary care patients with cancer was not identified when a search for all patients with cancer was conducted using electronic codes for malignancy. One in five patient records with an electronic code for a malignancy that was confirmed by registration with the Cancer Registry actually lacked the necessary documentation to verify the cancer type, date of diagnosis or any other aspect of the malignant condition. Overall, electronic codes for cancer in these medical records have a poor level of completeness (29.4%) and correctness (65.6%) when compared with the Cancer Registry.
CONCLUSIONS: The electronic codes in five general practices were not able to identify all patients on the practice lists with a cancer diagnosis. Practices will only be able to comply with guidelines and meet quality targets if they can identify all of their current patients with a cancer diagnosis and will require information from a Cancer Registry in order to do this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18550895     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmn023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  13 in total

1.  Increased primary healthcare utilisation among women with a history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Carriene Roorda; Annette J Berendsen; Feikje Groenhof; Klaas van der Meer; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Are GPs under-investigating older patients presenting with symptoms of ovarian cancer? Observational study using General Practice Research Database.

Authors:  A R Tate; A Nicholson; J A Cassell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Determining the date of diagnosis--is it a simple matter? The impact of different approaches to dating diagnosis on estimates of delayed care for ovarian cancer in UK primary care.

Authors:  A Rosemary Tate; Alexander G R Martin; Tarita Murray-Thomas; Sarah R Anderson; Jackie A Cassell
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Role of the general practitioner during the active breast cancer treatment phase: an analysis of health care use.

Authors:  Carriene Roorda; Geertruida H de Bock; Willem Jan van der Veen; Annemarie Lindeman; Liesbeth Jansen; Klaas van der Meer
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  The distribution of lung cancer across sectors of society in the United Kingdom: a study using national primary care data.

Authors:  Barbara Iyen-Omofoman; Richard B Hubbard; Chris J P Smith; Emily Sparks; Emma Bradley; Alison Bourke; Laila J Tata
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Adaptation and validation of the Charlson Index for Read/OXMIS coded databases.

Authors:  Nada F Khan; Rafael Perera; Stephen Harper; Peter W Rose
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Exposure to bisphosphonates and risk of gastrointestinal cancers: series of nested case-control studies with QResearch and CPRD data.

Authors:  Yana Vinogradova; Carol Coupland; Julia Hippisley-Cox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-16

8.  Optimising use of electronic health records to describe the presentation of rheumatoid arthritis in primary care: a strategy for developing code lists.

Authors:  Amanda Nicholson; Elizabeth Ford; Kevin A Davies; Helen E Smith; Greta Rait; A Rosemary Tate; Irene Petersen; Jackie Cassell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Optimising the use of electronic health records to estimate the incidence of rheumatoid arthritis in primary care: what information is hidden in free text?

Authors:  Elizabeth Ford; Amanda Nicholson; Rob Koeling; A Tate; John Carroll; Lesley Axelrod; Helen E Smith; Greta Rait; Kevin A Davies; Irene Petersen; Tim Williams; Jackie A Cassell
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Cancer diagnosed by emergency admission in England: an observational study using the general practice research database.

Authors:  Carmen Tsang; Alex Bottle; Azeem Majeed; Paul Aylin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.