Literature DB >> 1855041

Siriraj stroke score and validation study to distinguish supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage from infarction.

N Poungvarin1, A Viriyavejakul, C Komontri.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a simple, reliable, and safe diagnostic tool for acute stroke syndromes in a setting where computerised brain scanning was not readily available and to validate its accuracy with regard to pathological types of stroke.
DESIGN: 13 clinical variables that potentially might differentiate supratentorial cerebral haemorrhage from infarction were recorded and tested by multivariate analysis in a prospective study of 174 patients with acute stroke. In developing the Siriraj stroke score stepwise discriminant analysis of the variables was followed by a linear discriminant equation to differentiate between supratentorial haemorrhage and infarction. The score obtained was validated against scores in 206 other patients with stroke, computerised brain scans being used for definitive diagnosis.
SETTING: Siriraj Hospital Medical School, Mahidol University, Bangkok.
SUBJECTS: Prospective study: 174 consecutive patients with acute supratentorial stroke syndrome (not subarachnoid haemorrhage) admitted to Siriraj Hospital during 1984-5; validation study: 206 patients admitted to Siriraj Hospital or another hospital for supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage or infarction.
RESULTS: The Siriraj stroke score was developed and calculated as (2.5 x level of consciousness) + (2 x vomiting) + (2 x headache) + (0.1 x diastolic blood pressure) - (3 x atheroma markers) - 12. A score above 1 indicates supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage, while a score below -1 indicates infarction. The score between 1 and -1 represents an equivocal result needing a computerised brain scan or probability curve to verify the diagnosis. In the validation study of the Siriraj stroke score the diagnostic sensitivities of the score for cerebral haemorrhage and cerebral infarction were 89.3% and 93.2% respectively, with an overall predictive accuracy of 90.3%.
CONCLUSION: The Siriraj stroke score is widely accepted and applied in hospitals throughout Thailand as a simple and reliable bedside method for diagnosing acute stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1855041      PMCID: PMC1670347          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.302.6792.1565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  5 in total

1.  On the differential diagnosis between cerebral haemorrhage and infarction.

Authors:  S Schaafsma
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1968 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.181

Review 2.  Stroke in Asia: an epidemiological consideration.

Authors:  A Viriyavejakul
Journal:  Clin Neuropharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.592

3.  Accuracy of bedside diagnosis in stroke.

Authors:  M von Arbin; M Britton; U de Faire; C Helmers; K Miah; V Murray
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1981 May-Jun       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Clinical distinction of cerebral haemorrhage and cerebral infarction.

Authors:  M J Harrison
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Clinical diagnosis of intracranial haemorrhage using Guy's Hospital score.

Authors:  P A Sandercock; C M Allen; R N Corston; M J Harrison; C P Warlow
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-12-14
  5 in total
  23 in total

Review 1.  Clinical, radiological, and functional evaluation following acute stroke.

Authors:  D G Grosset
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  [Recommendations of the European Stroke Initiative for the diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage].

Authors:  S Külkens; P Ringleb; J Diedler; W Hacke; T Steiner
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Intracerebral hemorrhage and head trauma: common effects and common mechanisms of injury.

Authors:  William J Powers
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  The impact of delays in computed tomography of the brain on the accuracy of diagnosis and subsequent management in patients with minor stroke.

Authors:  J M Wardlaw; S L Keir; M S Dennis
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Disaster neurology: A new practice opportunity and challenge for the neurologist.

Authors:  Mill Etienne; Anthony G Alessi
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2013-12

6.  External validation of the ICH score.

Authors:  Jennifer L Clarke; S Claiborne Johnston; Mary Farrant; Richard Bernstein; David Tong; J Claude Hemphill
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 7.  Is routine computed tomography in strokes unnecessary?

Authors:  J M Wardlaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-12-03

8.  Clinical scores in the differential diagnosis of acute stroke.

Authors:  R Logan; S M Poulton; M P Severs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-24

Review 9.  Drug therapy for acute ischaemic stroke: risks versus benefits.

Authors:  R I Lindley
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 10.  Treatment of stroke in older patients. A state of the art review.

Authors:  G Harper
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.