Literature DB >> 18550360

Randomised controlled trials of palliative care - a survey of the views of advanced cancer patients and their relatives.

Clare D White1, Janet R Hardy, Kristen S Gilshenan, Margaret A Charles, C Ross Pinkerton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if patients with advanced cancer are interested in participation in palliative care research, particularly RCTs, and the importance of demographic factors in decision making. It sought relatives' views towards supporting trial entry, and assessed if demographic factors can predict participation.
METHODS: A questionnaire was developed through multiprofessional focus groups, patient and relative interviews and pilot studies. Consecutive patients known by the palliative care service to have advanced disease were approached. Relatives of consenting patients completed a parallel survey. K-means cluster analysis was used to differentiate between those willing and unwilling to participate. Multivariate logistic regression identified demographic factors predicting willingness.
RESULTS: One hundred and one patients and 100 relatives were included. 92% of patients would participate in studies involving simple interventions, whereas only 26% would consider studies of complex interventions. A similar pattern was observed for relative support. Over 75% of participants expressed altruistic views. Concepts of 'randomisation', 'placebo-control' and 'blinding' deterred about one-half. Many were prepared to complete short questionnaires, accept extra medications, investigations, hospital visits or admissions within a trial context but the possibility of side-effects was a major deterrent. Patient age was the only significant predictor of willingness to participate, with older patients less likely to participate.
CONCLUSION: Despite the likely absence of individual benefit, many patients appear willing to participate in palliative care research. Trial design and the possibility of side-effects proved very influential in their decision making. Clinical trials in palliative care are more likely to be successful if developed in accordance with the views of patients and their relatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18550360     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  18 in total

1.  Experience with palliative care in patients with advanced cancer at a tertiary care hospital in a developing country.

Authors:  Marwan Ghosn; Céline Boutros; Salma Geara; Joseph Kattan; Fadi Nasr; Georges Chahine
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Ethical challenges and solutions regarding delirium studies in palliative care.

Authors:  Lisa Sweet; Dimitrios Adamis; David J Meagher; Daniel Davis; David C Currow; Shirley H Bush; Christopher Barnes; Michael Hartwick; Meera Agar; Jessica Simon; William Breitbart; Neil MacDonald; Peter G Lawlor
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Does a social model of hospice day care affect advanced cancer patients' use of other health and social services? A prospective quasi-experimental trial.

Authors:  Irene J Higginson; Wei Gao; Brendan Amesbury; Charles Normand
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  What do palliative care patients and their relatives think about research in palliative care?-a systematic review.

Authors:  Clare White; Janet Hardy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Planning phase III multi-site clinical trials in palliative care: the role of consecutive cohort audits to identify potential participant populations.

Authors:  David Christopher Currow; Tania M Shelby-James; Meera Agar; John Plummer; Deborah Rowett; Paul Glare; Odette Spruyt; Janet Hardy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-11-29       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Clinical effectiveness of online training in palliative care of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Marta Pelayo-Alvarez; Santiago Perez-Hoyos; Yolanda Agra-Varela
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  Unique perception of clinical trials by Korean cancer patients.

Authors:  Su Jin Lee; Lee Chun Park; Jeeyun Lee; Seonwoo Kim; Moon Ki Choi; Jung Yong Hong; Sylvia Park; Chi Hoon Maeng; Wonjin Chang; Young Saing Kim; Se Hoon Park; Joon Oh Park; Ho Yeong Lim; Won Ki Kang; Young Suk Park
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  The attitudes of 1066 patients with cancer towards participation in randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  V Jenkins; D Farewell; L Batt; T Maughan; L Branston; C Langridge; L Parlour; V Farewell; L Fallowfield
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  The feasibility of a single-blinded fast-track pragmatic randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention for breathlessness in advanced disease.

Authors:  Morag C Farquhar; Irene J Higginson; Petrea Fagan; Sara Booth
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Patient, caregiver, health professional and researcher views and experiences of participating in research at the end of life: a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  Marjolein H Gysels; Catherine Evans; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.