Literature DB >> 18550299

Does gestational duration within the normal range predict infant neuromotor development?

Tamara van Batenburg-Eddes1, Laila de Groot, Lidia Arends, Alies de Vries, Henriette A Moll, Eric A P Steegers, Albert Hofman, Vincent W V Jaddoe, Frank C Verhulst, Henning Tiemeier.   

Abstract

AIM: To examine the extent to which infant neuromotor development is determined by gestational duration and birth weight within the normal range.
METHODS: The study was embedded within the Generation R Study, a population-based cohort in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. An adapted version of Touwen's Neurodevelopmental Examination was used to assess 3224 infants (1576 males and 1648 females) at corrected ages between 9 and 15 weeks. Non-optimal neuromotor development was defined as a score in the highest tertile.
RESULTS: Infant neuromotor development was significantly affected by gestational duration (odds ratio 0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.7;0.8). Adding a quadratic term of gestational duration to the model revealed a highly significant curvilinear association between gestational duration and neuromotor development; after adjusting for post-conceptional age this was still significant. Although babies with a 1 kg lower birth weight had a 30% higher risk of non-optimal neuromotor development, this association disappeared after adjustment for post-conceptional age.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that differences in infant neuromotor development can be explained even by variations in gestational duration within the normal range. If an infant is found to have minor neuromotor delays, account should be taken of this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18550299     DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Early Hum Dev        ISSN: 0378-3782            Impact factor:   2.079


  10 in total

1.  Developmental scores at 1 year with increasing gestational age, 37-41 weeks.

Authors:  Olga Rose; Estela Blanco; Suzanna M Martinez; Eastern Kang Sim; Marcela Castillo; Betsy Lozoff; Yvonne E Vaucher; Sheila Gahagan
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  The Generation R Study: design and cohort update until the age of 4 years.

Authors:  Vincent W V Jaddoe; Cornelia M van Duijn; Albert J van der Heijden; Johan P Mackenbach; Henriëtte A Moll; Eric A P Steegers; Henning Tiemeier; Andre G Uitterlinden; Frank C Verhulst; Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2012.

Authors:  Vincent W V Jaddoe; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; Albert J van der Heijden; Marinus H van Iizendoorn; Johan C de Jongste; Aad van der Lugt; Johan P Mackenbach; Henriëtte A Moll; Hein Raat; Fernando Rivadeneira; Eric A P Steegers; Henning Tiemeier; Andre G Uitterlinden; Frank C Verhulst; Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2010.

Authors:  Vincent W V Jaddoe; Cock M van Duijn; Albert J van der Heijden; Johan P Mackenbach; Henriëtte A Moll; Eric A P Steegers; Henning Tiemeier; Andre G Uitterlinden; Frank C Verhulst; Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Executive functions of six-year-old boys with normal birth weight and gestational age.

Authors:  Desiree Yee-Ling Phua; Anne Rifkin-Graboi; Seang-Mei Saw; Michael J Meaney; Anqi Qiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2017.

Authors:  Marjolein N Kooijman; Claudia J Kruithof; Cornelia M van Duijn; Liesbeth Duijts; Oscar H Franco; Marinus H van IJzendoorn; Johan C de Jongste; Caroline C W Klaver; Aad van der Lugt; Johan P Mackenbach; Henriëtte A Moll; Robin P Peeters; Hein Raat; Edmond H H M Rings; Fernando Rivadeneira; Marc P van der Schroeff; Eric A P Steegers; Henning Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Frank C Verhulst; Eppo Wolvius; Janine F Felix; Vincent W V Jaddoe
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Differentiating the cognitive development of early-term births in infants and toddlers: a cross-sectional study in China.

Authors:  Jing Hua; Jie Sun; Zhijuan Cao; Jialin Guo; Xiaotian Dai; Senran Lin; Guixiong Gu; Wenchong Du
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Cerebral disorders in the first 7 years of life in children born post-term: a cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Hald Rolschau; Annette Wind Olesen; Carsten Obel; Jørn Olsen; Chunsen S Wu; Poul-Erik Kofoed
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Association of Gestational Age at Birth With Subsequent Suspected Developmental Coordination Disorder in Early Childhood in China.

Authors:  Jing Hua; Anna L Barnett; Gareth J Williams; Xiaotian Dai; Yuanjie Sun; Haifeng Li; Guixia Chen; Lei Wang; Junyan Feng; Yingchun Liu; Lan Zhang; Ling Zhu; Tingting Weng; Hongyan Guan; Yue Gu; Yingchun Zhou; Andrew Butcher; Wenchong Du
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-12-01

10.  Gestational Age at Birth and Risk of Developmental Delay: The Upstate KIDS Study.

Authors:  Kimberly A Hochstedler; Griffith Bell; Hyojun Park; Akhgar Ghassabian; Erin M Bell; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Katherine L Grantz; Edwina H Yeung
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 1.862

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.