Literature DB >> 18549848

Impact on contrast, fluoroscopy, and catheter utilization from knowing the coronary artery bypass graft anatomy before diagnostic coronary angiography.

Indu Varghese1, Dustin M Boatman, Calvin T Peters, Jad Daye, Aman Haider, Michele Roesle, Subhash Banerjee, Emmanouil S Brilakis.   

Abstract

To what extent the unavailability of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) anatomy complicates the performance of diagnostic coronary angiography has not been studied. The medical and catheterization records and coronary angiograms of 367 consecutive CABG surgery patients who underwent 394 diagnostic coronary angiographic studies from October 1, 2004, to May 31, 2007, were retrospectively reviewed. The patients' mean age was 65+/-9 years, and 97% were men. The mean interval from CABG surgery to angiography was 8.3+/-6.1 years. Patent left internal mammary artery grafts were found in 75%, and the mean number of patent grafts was 2.1+/-1.0. Compared with angiograms with known CABG anatomy, angiograms with unknown CABG anatomy (26%) required significantly higher amounts of contrast (189+/-7 vs 158+/-4 ml), longer fluoroscopy times (14.0+/-0.7 vs 10.6+/-0.4 minutes), and more diagnostic catheters (3.0+/-0.1 vs 2.5+/-0.05) (p<0.001 for all comparisons). The unavailability of CABG anatomy remained associated with increased contrast, fluoroscopy, and catheter use after multivariate adjustment. Proximal anastomotic bypass markers were associated with lower contrast use but were seen in only 9% of patients. In conclusion, the unavailability of CABG anatomy significantly and independently increases the use of contrast, fluoroscopy, and catheters during diagnostic coronary angiography. Every effort should be made to obtain CABG anatomy before diagnostic angiography is performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18549848     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  Secondary revascularization after CABG surgery.

Authors:  Javier Escaned
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Predictors of Excess Patient Radiation Exposure During Chronic Total Occlusion Coronary Intervention: Insights From a Contemporary Multicentre Registry.

Authors:  Georgios E Christakopoulos; Georgios Christopoulos; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Khaldoon Alaswad; Robert W Yeh; Farouc A Jaffer; Michael R Wyman; William L Lombardi; Muhammad Nauman J Tarar; J Aaron Grantham; David E Kandzari; Nicholas Lembo; Jeffrey W Moses; Ajay J Kirtane; Manish Parikh; Philip Green; Matthew Finn; Santiago Garcia; Anthony H Doing; Raja Hatem; Craig A Thompson; Subhash Banerjee; Emmanouil S Brilakis
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Saphenous vein graft interventions.

Authors:  Emmanouil S Brilakis; Michael Lee; Julinda Mehilli; Konstantinos Marmagkiolis; Josep Rodes-Cabau; Rajesh Sachdeva; Anna Kotsia; George Christopoulos; Bavana V Rangan; Atif Mohammed; Subhash Banerjee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-05

4.  The sternal wire code; Solving the problem of missing coronary artery bypass graft records during cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  David S Wald; Ben J Wald; Angus Radford; Alex Shipolini
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2018-04-27

5.  Value of Image Fusion in Coronary Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts.

Authors:  Julien Plessis; Karine Warin Fresse; Zachary Cahouch; Thibaut Manigold; Vincent Letocart; Laurianne Le Gloan; Béatrice Guyomarch; Patrice Guerin
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 5.501

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.