Literature DB >> 18548964

Implant-retained auricular prostheses: an assessment of implant success and prosthetic complications.

Cemal Aydin1, Seçil Karakoca, Handan Yilmaz, Caner Yilmaz.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to evaluate the success rates and peri-implant soft tissue responses of auricular implants, to assess prosthetic complications, and to calculate the survival rate of silicone auricular prostheses. Twenty-nine extraoral implants were placed in 10 patients with 11 auricular defects. Implant failure was defined as clinically detectable implant mobility, and a 5-point scale was used to record the health of peri-implant soft tissues. Prosthetic complications were assessed, and the survival rate of silicone auricular prostheses was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The implant success rate was 100%. A few soft tissue problems were noted. The overall cumulative survival rate for the first prostheses of the patients was 70% after 18 months. The mean survival time was 17 months. Extraoral implants had a very high success rate in the mastoid region. Prosthetic assessment indicated that although experience with wearing prostheses reduces retention degradation, discoloration and reduced quality of fit at the prosthesis edge over time remain the major problems in maxillofacial prosthetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18548964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  9 in total

1.  Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Partial Ear Defect: 2 Case Reports.

Authors:  Meryem Gülce Subaşı; Gamze Alnıaçık; Abdullah Kalaycı; Serhan Akman; Ercan Durmuş
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-01-06

2.  A blue tooth - auricular prosthesis: a case report.

Authors:  Bandlar H Naveen; Korapathi R Kashinath; Swapnil B Shankargouda; Mythri Halappa
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-08-20

3.  Retrospective study of treatment outcomes with implant retained auricular prostheses at a tertiary referral care centre.

Authors:  Gunjan Pruthi; Kirti Bansal; Veena Jain; Dheeraj Kumar Koli
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-05-04

4.  Effect of surface treated silicon dioxide nanoparticles on some mechanical properties of maxillofacial silicone elastomer.

Authors:  Sara M Zayed; Ahmad M Alshimy; Amal E Fahmy
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2014-12-09

5.  Stability of the prosthetic screws of three types of craniofacial prostheses retention systems.

Authors:  Antonio Gabriel Lanata-Flores; Eder Alberto Sigua-Rodriguez; Douglas Rangel Goulart; Veber Luiz Bomfim-Azevedo; Sergio Olate; José Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-12-27

6.  Rehabilitation of Unilateral Congenital Microtia by Implant-retained Prosthesis.

Authors:  Abhay Datarkar; Surendra Daware; Ravi Dande; Ujwala Datarkar
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jul-Dec

7.  Dental implant-retained auricular prosthesis.

Authors:  Farzad Yeganeh; Abbas Haghighat; Maryam Amini-Pozveh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

8.  Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case report.

Authors:  Vladimir Frias
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-06-21

Review 9.  Outcome measures in facial prosthesis research: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rachael Y Jablonski; Benjamin J Veale; Trevor J Coward; Andrew J Keeling; Chris Bojke; Sue H Pavitt; Brian R Nattress
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.426

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.