Literature DB >> 18548513

Videoconferencing and forensic mental health in Australia.

Danny H Sullivan1, Murray Chapman, Paul E Mullen.   

Abstract

Videoconferencing is in common use in Australian forensic mental health services. It provides opportunities to link remote prisons, courts, and psychiatric clinics with distant specialist services, and enables a range of activities including assessment, treatment and feedback, expert testimony, education, and inter-service planning. These functions are acceptable to patients and clinicians, and in Australia videoconferencing minimizes disruption to small services and their patients, who might otherwise face lengthy journeys. In particular, marginalized patient groups, including indigenous people and prisoners, may receive better services. The evidence base supports use of videoconferencing despite a number of practical, legal, and clinical issues that may reduce its effectiveness compared with face-to-face assessments. Videoconferencing technologies are critical to effective forensic mental health services in Australia. (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18548513     DOI: 10.1002/bsl.815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Sci Law        ISSN: 0735-3936


  3 in total

1.  Bridging the distance between urban and rural psychiatry.

Authors:  Murray Chapman; Aleksandar Janca
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 2.  Lessons Learned in Prison and Jail-Based Telepsychiatry.

Authors:  Edward Kaftarian
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  eHealth in Treatment of Offenders in Forensic Mental Health: A Review of the Current State.

Authors:  Hanneke Kip; Yvonne H A Bouman; Saskia M Kelders; Lisette J E W C van Gemert-Pijnen
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.157

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.