Literature DB >> 18547830

Prospective changes to condylar position in symphyseal distraction osteogenesis.

Constantin A Landes1, Katharina Laudemann, Robert Sader, Martin Mack.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether symphyseal distraction for correction of mandibular transverse deficiencies and dental crowding provokes lateral shift of the condyles, because this may have secondary influence upon temporomandibular joint function. STUDY
DESIGN: Nine patients' routine pre- and postoperative computerized tomography scans were evaluated for intercanine distance and condylar position before and 3 months after mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis (MSDO). Identical bone-borne distraction was applied in all cases at 0.6 mm distraction per day, starting 5 days after surgery.
RESULTS: Intercanine distance increased effectively by 3.8 +/- 1.8 mm (P = .004), condylar distance decreased by 1.2 +/- 0.8 mm (P = .02), condylar angulation decreased by 0.03 +/- 4.3 degrees (P = .7), and lateral, cranial, and inner condylar cortex to fossa distances changed by 0.4 +/- 0.5 mm (P = .8), 0.4 +/- 0.5 mm (P = .7), and 0.4 +/- 0.3 mm (P = .4), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: MSDO causes no lateral displacement and rather a decrease of condylar transversal distance whereas angulation, vertical medial, cranial, and lateral distance to the fossa remain unchanged. This finding asserts the clinical absence of temporo-mandibular dysfunction associated with MSDO as reported in the literature, even though soft tissue changes and long-term outcomes require further follow-up studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18547830     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.12.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  3 in total

1.  Stress distribution in the temporo-mandibular joint discs during jaw closing: a high-resolution three-dimensional finite-element model analysis.

Authors:  Charles Savoldelli; Pierre-Olivier Bouchard; Raounak Loudad; Patrick Baque; Yannick Tillier
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Orthognathic Surgery: Demystifying Differences in Concepts, Techniques and Outcomes.

Authors:  Manikandhan Ramanathan; Godwin Alex Kiruba; Amelia Christabel; Anantanarayanan Parameswaran; Sanjanaa Kapoor; Hermann F Sailer
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-07-21

Review 3.  Mandibular Midline Distraction Osteogenesis with a Bone-borne, Tooth-borne or Hybrid Distraction Appliance: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Annette Dalgaard Kjellerup; Tue Lindberg Blæhr
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2018-09-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.