OBJECTIVES: Human cancer tissue xenograft models may provide a more accurate reflection of tumor biology than cell lines. This study evaluates the genetic and phenotypic stability of primary human gynecological tumors grown as serially transplanted xenografts. The response to conventional chemotherapy and novel molecular targeted chemotherapy is assessed in one of the transplantable xenograft lines. METHODS: Fresh tumor was transplanted beneath the renal capsule of NOD/SCID mice. Transplantable tumor lines were derived from 5 tumors (4 ovarian carcinomas and 1 uterine sarcoma), and serially transplanted for 2-6 generations. Comparisons were made between primary tumor and corresponding transplantable xenografts by CGH array, immunohistochemistry, and BRCA mutation analysis. Transplantable xenografts created from known BRCA1 germline mutation carriers were analyzed for histopathologic response (tumor volume, apoptotic and mitotic indices) to combination carboplatin/paclitaxel and to PARP inhibitor (PJ34). RESULTS: Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis applied to a 287 feature CGH array demonstrated a low degree of intratumoral genetic variation in 4/5 cases, with greater degree of variation in the fifth case (clear cell ovarian carcinoma derived from an omental sample). Assessment of proliferation using MIB-1 staining was concordant between primary tumor and transplantable xenograft in all ovarian cancer cases. BRCA mutation analysis identified germline BRCA1 mutation for further testing and this xenograft showed a significant response to carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy, including a decrease in tumor volume and proliferation but did not demonstrate a response to the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitor PJ34. CONCLUSIONS: Xenografts derived from gynecologic tumors can be serially transplanted and grown under renal capsule of NOD/SCID mice with minimal genetic change. This model may be used to study progression of tumors, identify therapeutic targets, and test treatment modalities in tumors with well-characterized abnormalities in genes of fundamental importance in ovarian carcinogenesis, such as loss of BRCA1.
OBJECTIVES:Humancancer tissue xenograft models may provide a more accurate reflection of tumor biology than cell lines. This study evaluates the genetic and phenotypic stability of primary human gynecological tumors grown as serially transplanted xenografts. The response to conventional chemotherapy and novel molecular targeted chemotherapy is assessed in one of the transplantable xenograft lines. METHODS: Fresh tumor was transplanted beneath the renal capsule of NOD/SCIDmice. Transplantable tumor lines were derived from 5 tumors (4 ovarian carcinomas and 1 uterine sarcoma), and serially transplanted for 2-6 generations. Comparisons were made between primary tumor and corresponding transplantable xenografts by CGH array, immunohistochemistry, and BRCA mutation analysis. Transplantable xenografts created from known BRCA1 germline mutation carriers were analyzed for histopathologic response (tumor volume, apoptotic and mitotic indices) to combination carboplatin/paclitaxel and to PARP inhibitor (PJ34). RESULTS: Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis applied to a 287 feature CGH array demonstrated a low degree of intratumoral genetic variation in 4/5 cases, with greater degree of variation in the fifth case (clear cell ovarian carcinoma derived from an omental sample). Assessment of proliferation using MIB-1 staining was concordant between primary tumor and transplantable xenograft in all ovarian cancer cases. BRCA mutation analysis identified germline BRCA1 mutation for further testing and this xenograft showed a significant response to carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy, including a decrease in tumor volume and proliferation but did not demonstrate a response to the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitor PJ34. CONCLUSIONS: Xenografts derived from gynecologic tumors can be serially transplanted and grown under renal capsule of NOD/SCIDmice with minimal genetic change. This model may be used to study progression of tumors, identify therapeutic targets, and test treatment modalities in tumors with well-characterized abnormalities in genes of fundamental importance in ovarian carcinogenesis, such as loss of BRCA1.
Authors: S John Weroha; Marc A Becker; Sergio Enderica-Gonzalez; Sean C Harrington; Ann L Oberg; Matthew J Maurer; Sarah E Perkins; Mariam AlHilli; Kristina A Butler; Sarah McKinstry; Stephanie Fink; Robert B Jenkins; Xiaonan Hou; Kimberly R Kalli; Karin M Goodman; Jann N Sarkaria; Beth Y Karlan; Amanika Kumar; Scott H Kaufmann; Lynn C Hartmann; Paul Haluska Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-01-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Yoko S DeRose; Guoying Wang; Yi-Chun Lin; Philip S Bernard; Saundra S Buys; Mark T W Ebbert; Rachel Factor; Cindy Matsen; Brett A Milash; Edward Nelson; Leigh Neumayer; R Lor Randall; Inge J Stijleman; Bryan E Welm; Alana L Welm Journal: Nat Med Date: 2011-10-23 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Monique D Topp; Lynne Hartley; Michele Cook; Valerie Heong; Emma Boehm; Lauren McShane; Jan Pyman; Orla McNally; Sumitra Ananda; Marisol Harrell; Dariush Etemadmoghadam; Laura Galletta; Kathryn Alsop; Gillian Mitchell; Stephen B Fox; Jeffrey B Kerr; Karla J Hutt; Scott H Kaufmann; Elizabeth M Swisher; David D Bowtell; Matthew J Wakefield; Clare L Scott Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Mariana Varna; Guilhem Bousquet; Irmine Ferreira; Marie Goulard; Morad El-Bouchtaoui; Pierre Mongiat Artus; Jérome Verine; Eric de Kerviler; Lucie Hernandez; Christophe Leboeuf; Bernard Escudier; Luc Legrès; Niclas Setterblad; Hany Soliman; Jean-Paul Feugeas; Anne Janin; Philippe Bertheau Journal: Int J Clin Exp Pathol Date: 2014-05-15
Authors: Anneliese Fortuna-Costa; Regina Alcantara Granato; Walter Meohas; Ana Cristina de Sá Lopes; Anabela Cunha Caruso; Rafael Castro E Silva Pinheiro; Pedro da Gama d'Eça; Rhayra Braga Dias; Jamila Alessandra Perini; Ana Paula Fernandes Barbosa; Renato Augusto Moreira de Sá; João Antonio Matheus Guimarães; Samuel S Murray; Maria Eugenia Leite Duarte Journal: Histol Histopathol Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 2.303